Literature DB >> 11213824

Mass closure technique: an experimental study on separation of wound edge.

Y Cengiz1, H Gislason, K Svanes, L A Israelsson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study separation of wound edges in midline laparotomy incisions closed with either a mass stitch or a stitch incorporating only aponeurosis.
DESIGN: Experimental study in pig.
SETTING: University hospital, Norway. ANIMALS: 8 domestic pigs.
METHODS: Steel sutures were used and metallic clips were placed in the aponeurosis. After increasing the intra-abdominal pressure the distance between the lateral edge of stitches and between pairs of clips was measured on sequential radiographs.
RESULTS: After three hours with raised intra-abdominal pressure the lateral edge of stitches became separated by a mean (SD) of 5.6 (1.3) mm with a mass stitch and by 0.5 (0.6) mm with stitches placed only in the aponeurosis (p < 0.001). Corresponding figures for separation of clips was 3.6 (1.5) mm and 0.1 (0.3) mm (p < 0.001). The suture cut through the muscle by more than 3mm in 25 out of 36 mass stitches. Muscle and peritoneum included in the mass stitch was compressed, darkly discoloured, and there were signs of haemorrhage.
CONCLUSIONS: Wound edges become separated with a mass stitch but not with stitches placed only in the aponeurosis when the intra-abdominal pressure is raised after closure of midline laparotomy incisions. This results from sutures compressing or cutting through subcuticular fat, muscle, and peritoneum enclosed in a mass stitch.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11213824     DOI: 10.1080/110241501750069846

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg        ISSN: 1102-4151


  9 in total

1.  Risk factors for wound complications in midline abdominal incisions related to the size of stitches.

Authors:  D Millbourn; Y Cengiz; L A Israelsson
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Wound complications and stitch length.

Authors:  D Millbourn; L A Israelsson
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2003-09-06       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 3.  Closing midline abdominal incisions.

Authors:  Leif A Israelsson; Daniel Millbourn
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-11-11       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Cost analysis of the use of small stitches when closing midline abdominal incisions.

Authors:  D Millbourn; A Wimo; L A Israelsson
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  A multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of small stitches on the incidence of incisional hernia in midline incisions.

Authors:  Joris J Harlaar; Eva B Deerenberg; Gabrielle H van Ramshorst; Harold E Lont; Ed C M H van der Borst; Willem R Schouten; Joos Heisterkamp; Helena C van Doorn; Huib A Cense; Frits Berends; Hein B A C Stockmann; Wietske W Vrijland; Esther C J Consten; Reyer T Ottow; Peter M N Y H Go; John J Hermans; Ewout W Steyerberg; Johan F Lange
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Incisional hernias following open gynecological surgery: a population-based study.

Authors:  Kerstin Bewö; Johanna Österberg; Mats Löfgren; Gabriel Sandblom
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 2.344

7.  Optimal Suture Bite Size for Closure of Feline Linea Alba-A Cadaveric Study.

Authors:  Amanda L Bartier; Aylin Atilla; Rebecca Archer; Grace P S Kwong
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-12-10

8.  Development of incisional herniation after midline laparotomy.

Authors:  J J Harlaar; E B Deerenberg; R S Dwarkasing; A M Kamperman; G J Kleinrensink; J Jeekel; J F Lange
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2017-05-10

9.  Magnitude of Abdominal Wound Dehiscence and Associated Factors of Patients Who Underwent Abdominal Operation at St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Berhanetsehay Teklewold; Dut Pioth; Tadele Dana
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2020-02-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.