Literature DB >> 23839330

Cost analysis of the use of small stitches when closing midline abdominal incisions.

D Millbourn1, A Wimo, L A Israelsson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Suturing with small stitches instead of with large reduces the risk for surgical site infection and incisional hernia in continuously closed midline abdominal incisions. The purpose was to analyse if using small stitches generated cost savings.
METHODS: Between 2001 and 2006 closure of midline incisions using small stitches was, in a randomised trial, compared with the use of large stitches. In 2011 all patients included in the randomised trial, who until then, had had an incisional hernia repair, were recorded. The cost for an open incisional hernia repair with mesh reinforcement during 2010 was calculated. The analysis included both direct and indirect costs.
RESULTS: Of 321 patients closed with small stitches incisional hernia occurred in 11 and 3 needed repair. Of 370 patients closed with large stitches herniation occurred in 45 and 14 needed repair. The direct cost per hernia repair was 59,909 Swedish krona (SEK) and the indirect cost was 26,348 SEK. Suturing time with small stitches was 4.6 min longer, increasing the cost for the index operation by 1,076 SEK. From the societal perspective (direct and indirect costs), using small stitches generated a cost reduction of 1,339 SEK for each patient. From the perspective of the public payer (direct costs) the cost reduction was 601 SEK. Using small stitches generated cost savings from a societal perspective if the suturing time was not prolonged over 10.3 min.
CONCLUSIONS: Using small stitches when closing midline abdominal incisions with a continuous single-layer technique generates cost savings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23839330     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-013-1135-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  22 in total

1.  Wound complications and stitch length.

Authors:  D Millbourn; L A Israelsson
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2003-09-06       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 2.  The treatment of complicated groin and incisional hernias.

Authors:  R E Stoppa
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Small tissue bites and wound strength: an experimental study.

Authors:  Y Cengiz; P Blomquist; L A Israelsson
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-03

4.  Surgical site infections and cost in obese patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Wick; Kenzo Hirose; Andrew D Shore; Jeanne M Clark; Susan L Gearhart; Jonathan Efron; Martin A Makary
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2011-05-16

5.  Cost minimisation analysis of change in closure technique of midline incisions.

Authors:  L A Israelsson; A Wimo
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  2000-08

6.  Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia.

Authors:  Jacobus W A Burger; Roland W Luijendijk; Wim C J Hop; Jens A Halm; Emiel G G Verdaasdonk; Johannes Jeekel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Open suture versus mesh repair of primary incisional hernias: a cost-utility analysis.

Authors:  K R Finan; M L Kilgore; M T Hawn
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Fascia closure after midline laparotomy: results of a randomized trial.

Authors:  J Wissing; T J van Vroonhoven; M E Schattenkerk; H F Veen; R J Ponsen; J Jeekel
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Effect of stitch length on wound complications after closure of midline incisions: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Daniel Millbourn; Yucel Cengiz; Leif A Israelsson
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2009-11

10.  Incisional hernia after midline laparotomy: a prospective study.

Authors:  L A Israelsson; T Jonsson
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1996-02
View more
  7 in total

1.  Impact of incisional hernia development following abdominal operations on total healthcare cost.

Authors:  Vamsi V Alli; Jianying Zhang; Dana A Telem
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  The economic burden of incisional ventral hernia repair: a multicentric cost analysis.

Authors:  J-F Gillion; D Sanders; M Miserez; F Muysoms
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  A Risk Model and Cost Analysis of Incisional Hernia After Elective, Abdominal Surgery Based Upon 12,373 Cases: The Case for Targeted Prophylactic Intervention.

Authors:  John P Fischer; Marten N Basta; Michael N Mirzabeigi; Andrew R Bauder; Justin P Fox; Jeffrey A Drebin; Joseph M Serletti; Stephen J Kovach
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  A cost-utility analysis of small bite sutures versus large bite sutures in the closure of midline laparotomies in the United Kingdom National Health Service.

Authors:  Shyam Ajay Gokani; Karl O Elmqvist; Osman El-Koubani; Javier Ash; Sudeep K Biswas; Maxime Rigaudy
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2018-02-19

5.  Prophylactic retrorectus mesh versus no mesh in midline emergency laparotomy closure for prevention of incisional hernia (PREEMER): study protocol for a multicentre, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Elisa Mäkäräinen; Matti Tolonen; Ville Sallinen; Panu Mentula; Ari Leppäniemi; Mirella Ahonen-Siirtola; Juha Saarnio; Pasi Ohtonen; Filip Muysoms; Tero Rautio
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2022-01-06

6.  Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic hernioplasty with and without fascial repair (IPOM-Plus vs IPOM) for ventral hernia: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sunil Basukala; Ayush Tamang; Sushil Bahadur Rawal; Srijan Malla; Ujwal Bhusal; Subodh Dhakal; Shriya Sharma
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-08-01

7.  Incisional hernia after surgery for colorectal cancer: a population-based register study.

Authors:  Harald Söderbäck; Ulf Gunnarsson; Per Hellman; Gabriel Sandblom
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 2.571

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.