Literature DB >> 11212627

Signal-detection analysis of group decision making.

R D Sorkin1, C J Hays, R West.   

Abstract

How effectively can groups of people make yes-or-no decisions? To answer this question, we used signal-detection theory to model the behavior of groups of human participants in a visual detection task. The detection model specifies how performance depends on the group's size, the competence of the members, the correlation among members' judgments, the constraints on member interaction, and the group's decision rule. The model also allows specification of performance efficiency, which is a measure of how closely a group's performance matches the statistically optimal group. The performance of our groups was consistent with the theoretical predictions, but efficiency decreased as group size increased. This result was attributable to a decrease in the effort that members gave to their individual tasks rather than to an inefficiency in combining the information in the members' judgments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11212627     DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.108.1.183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  31 in total

1.  "Nonparametric" A' and other modern misconceptions about signal detection theory.

Authors:  Richard E Pastore; Edward J Crawley; Melody S Berens; Michael A Skelly
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

2.  Collaboration improves unspeeded search in the absence of precise target information.

Authors:  Alison Enright; Nathan Leggett; Jason S McCarley
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  The perception of a face is no more than the sum of its parts.

Authors:  Jason M Gold; Patrick J Mundy; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-03-05

4.  The wisdom of crowds for visual search.

Authors:  Mordechai Z Juni; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A perceptually completed whole is less than the sum of its parts.

Authors:  Jason M Gold
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-05-05

6.  Separating decision and encoding noise in signal detection tasks.

Authors:  Carlos Alexander Cabrera; Zhong-Lin Lu; Barbara Anne Dosher
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Optimally interacting minds.

Authors:  Bahador Bahrami; Karsten Olsen; Peter E Latham; Andreas Roepstorff; Geraint Rees; Chris D Frith
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Individuals fail to reap the collective benefits of diversity because of over-reliance on personal information.

Authors:  Alan Novaes Tump; Max Wolf; Jens Krause; Ralf H J M Kurvers
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Detection-theoretic analysis of the observer-based psychophysical procedure.

Authors:  Raman Arora; Robert A Lutfi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Three heads are better than two: Comparing learning properties and performances across individuals, dyads, and triads through a computational approach.

Authors:  Tsutomu Harada
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.