Literature DB >> 24796662

A perceptually completed whole is less than the sum of its parts.

Jason M Gold1.   

Abstract

How efficiently do people integrate the disconnected image fragments that fall on their eyes when they view partly occluded objects? In the present study, I used a psychophysical summation-at-threshold technique to address this question by measuring discrimination performance with both isolated and combined features of physically fragmented but perceptually complete objects. If visual completion promotes superior integration efficiency, performance with a visually completed object should exceed what would be expected from performance with the individual object parts shown in isolation. Contrary to this prediction, results showed that discrimination performance with both static and moving versions of physically fragmented but perceptually complete objects was significantly worse than would be expected from performance with their constituent parts. These results present a challenge for future theories of visual completion.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  information integration; perceptual organization; visual completion

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24796662      PMCID: PMC4221583          DOI: 10.1177/0956797614530725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  29 in total

1.  Deriving behavioural receptive fields for visually completed contours.

Authors:  J M Gold; R F Murray; P J Bennett; A B Sekuler
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Time course of amodal completion revealed by a shape discrimination task.

Authors:  R F Murray; A B Sekuler; P J Bennett
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

3.  Perceptual completion across the vertical meridian and the role of early visual cortex.

Authors:  Jonathan Pillow; Nava Rubin
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-02-28       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Wholes, holes, and basic features in vision.

Authors:  James R Pomerantz
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Uncertainty and invariance in the human visual cortex.

Authors:  Bosco S Tjan; Vaia Lestou; Zoe Kourtzi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Spatial and temporal properties of illusory contours and amodal boundary completion.

Authors:  D L Ringach; R Shapley
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

8.  Grating summation in fovea and periphery.

Authors:  N Graham; J G Robson; J Nachmias
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination.

Authors:  A E Burgess; R F Wagner; R J Jennings; H B Barlow
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-10-02       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Where similarity beats redundancy: the importance of context, higher order similarity, and response assignment.

Authors:  Ami Eidels; James T Townsend; James R Pomerantz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  3 in total

1.  When two heads are better than one: Interactive versus independent benefits of collaborative cognition.

Authors:  Allison A Brennan; James T Enns
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

2.  Linear Integration of Sensory Evidence over Space and Time Underlies Face Categorization.

Authors:  Gouki Okazawa; Long Sha; Roozbeh Kiani
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Amodal Completion Revisited.

Authors:  Walter Gerbino
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2020-08-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.