Literature DB >> 11212366

Brain tissue classification of magnetic resonance images using partial volume modeling.

S Ruan1, C Jaggi, J Xue, J Fadili, D Bloyet.   

Abstract

This paper presents a fully automatic three-dimensional classification of brain tissues for Magnetic Resonance (MR) images. An MR image volume may be composed of a mixture of several tissue types due to partial volume effects. Therefore, we consider that in a brain dataset there are not only the three main types of brain tissue: gray matter, white matter, and cerebro spinal fluid, called pure classes, but also mixtures, called mixclasses. A statistical model of the mixtures is proposed and studied by means of simulations. It is shown that it can be approximated by a Gaussian function under some conditions. The D'Agostino-Pearson normality test is used to assess the risk alpha of the approximation. In order to classify a brain into three types of brain tissue and deal with the problem of partial volume effects, the proposed algorithm uses two steps: 1) segmentation of the brain into pure and mixclasses using the mixture model; 2) reclassification of the mixclasses into the pure classes using knowledge about the obtained pure classes. Both steps use Markov random field (MRF) models. The multifractal dimension, describing the topology of the brain, is added to the MRFs to improve discrimination of the mixclasses. The algorithm is evaluated using both simulated images and real MR images with different T1-weighted acquisition sequences.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11212366     DOI: 10.1109/42.897810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  17 in total

1.  Automated brain tissue segmentation based on fractional signal mapping from inversion recovery Look-Locker acquisition.

Authors:  Wanyong Shin; Xiujuan Geng; Hong Gu; Wang Zhan; Qihong Zou; Yihong Yang
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Method for bias field correction of brain T1-weighted magnetic resonance images minimizing segmentation error.

Authors:  Juan D Gispert; Santiago Reig; Javier Pascau; Juan J Vaquero; Pedro García-Barreno; Manuel Desco
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Generalized method for partial volume estimation and tissue segmentation in cerebral magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  April Khademi; Anastasios Venetsanopoulos; Alan R Moody
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-04-23

4.  Accurate quantification methods to evaluate cervical cord atrophy in multiple sclerosis patients.

Authors:  J Carbonell-Caballero; J V Manjón; L Martí-Bonmatí; J R Olalla; B Casanova; M de la Iglesia-Vayá; F Coret; M Robles
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2006-11-18       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 5.  An artificial immune-activated neural network applied to brain 3D MRI segmentation.

Authors:  Akmal Younis; Mohamed Ibrahim; Mansur Kabuka; Nigel John
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  An open source multivariate framework for n-tissue segmentation with evaluation on public data.

Authors:  Brian B Avants; Nicholas J Tustison; Jue Wu; Philip A Cook; James C Gee
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2011-12

Review 7.  Partial volume effect modeling for segmentation and tissue classification of brain magnetic resonance images: A review.

Authors:  Jussi Tohka
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-11-28

8.  Comparison of T1-weighted 2D TSE, 3D SPGR, and two-point 3D Dixon MRI for automated segmentation of visceral adipose tissue at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Faezeh Fallah; Jürgen Machann; Petros Martirosian; Fabian Bamberg; Fritz Schick; Bin Yang
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  Partial volume model for brain MRI scan using MP2RAGE.

Authors:  Quentin Duché; Hervé Saint-Jalmes; Oscar Acosta; Parnesh Raniga; Pierrick Bourgeat; Vincent Doré; Gary F Egan; Olivier Salvado
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Comparison of breast tissue measurements using magnetic resonance imaging, digital mammography and a mathematical algorithm.

Authors:  Lee-Jane W Lu; Thomas K Nishino; Raleigh F Johnson; Fatima Nayeem; Donald G Brunder; Hyunsu Ju; Morton H Leonard; James J Grady; Tuenchit Khamapirad
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.