OBJECT: Automatic accurate measurement techniques are needed to increase reproducibility in the quantification of cervical cord area (CCA) with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the assessment of central nervous system (CNS) atrophy in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two segmentation methods were implemented: (1) spatial mean brightness level estimation (SMBLE), and (2) partial-volume modeling (PVM). These were evaluated with the inclusion of spinal cord inclination and/or partial-volume-effect corrections. An averaged manually segmented set was considered as reference. Thirty MR studies were used to compare the different methods. A set of 15 MS patients and 15 control subjects within a two-year longitudinal study were used to evaluate cord atrophy with the best method. Statistical evaluation was made by using an intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman comparisons. RESULTS: Partial-volume modeling with spinal cord inclination correction and partial-volume spinal-cord contour contribution estimation was the most accurate method. The longitudinal test showed a 4% decrease in CCA in MS patients with no significant reduction in control subjects. CONCLUSION: The automatic PVM cord-segmentation approach, taking into consideration the spinal-cord inclination and partial-volume treatment, provides reproducibility and increased accuracy in the evaluation of cord atrophy, allowing the monitoring of changes in MS patients.
OBJECT: Automatic accurate measurement techniques are needed to increase reproducibility in the quantification of cervical cord area (CCA) with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the assessment of central nervous system (CNS) atrophy in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two segmentation methods were implemented: (1) spatial mean brightness level estimation (SMBLE), and (2) partial-volume modeling (PVM). These were evaluated with the inclusion of spinal cord inclination and/or partial-volume-effect corrections. An averaged manually segmented set was considered as reference. Thirty MR studies were used to compare the different methods. A set of 15 MSpatients and 15 control subjects within a two-year longitudinal study were used to evaluate cord atrophy with the best method. Statistical evaluation was made by using an intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman comparisons. RESULTS: Partial-volume modeling with spinal cord inclination correction and partial-volume spinal-cord contour contribution estimation was the most accurate method. The longitudinal test showed a 4% decrease in CCA in MSpatients with no significant reduction in control subjects. CONCLUSION: The automatic PVM cord-segmentation approach, taking into consideration the spinal-cord inclination and partial-volume treatment, provides reproducibility and increased accuracy in the evaluation of cord atrophy, allowing the monitoring of changes in MSpatients.
Authors: N A Losseff; S L Webb; J I O'Riordan; R Page; L Wang; G J Barker; P S Tofts; W I McDonald; D H Miller; A J Thompson Journal: Brain Date: 1996-06 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: V L Stevenson; S M Leary; N A Losseff; G J Parker; G J Barker; Y Husmani; D H Miller; A J Thompson Journal: Neurology Date: 1998-07 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Chris H Polman; Stephen C Reingold; Gilles Edan; Massimo Filippi; Hans-Peter Hartung; Ludwig Kappos; Fred D Lublin; Luanne M Metz; Henry F McFarland; Paul W O'Connor; Magnhild Sandberg-Wollheim; Alan J Thompson; Brian G Weinshenker; Jerry S Wolinsky Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Simon J Hickman; Olivier Coulon; Geoffrey J M Parker; Gareth J Barker; Valerie L Stevenson; Declan T Chard; Simon R Arridge; Alan J Thompson; David H Miller Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Charidimos Tsagkas; Anna Altermatt; Ulrike Bonati; Simon Pezold; Julia Reinhard; Michael Amann; Philippe Cattin; Jens Wuerfel; Dirk Fischer; Katrin Parmar; Arne Fischmann Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-04-30 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Nico Papinutto; Carlo Asteggiano; Antje Bischof; Tristan J Gundel; Eduardo Caverzasi; William A Stern; Stefano Bastianello; Stephen L Hauser; Roland G Henry Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2019-09-30 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Michael Amann; Simon Pezold; Yvonne Naegelin; Ketut Fundana; Michaela Andělová; Katrin Weier; Christoph Stippich; Ludwig Kappos; Ernst-Wilhelm Radue; Philippe Cattin; Till Sprenger Journal: J Neurol Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 4.849