Literature DB >> 11206163

Investigation of the relationship among three common measures of precedence: fusion, localization dominance, and discrimination suppression.

R Y Litovsky1, B G Shinn-Cunningham.   

Abstract

Listeners have a remarkable ability to localize and identify sound sources in reverberant environments. The term "precedence effect" (PE; also known as the "Haas effect," "law of the first wavefront," and "echo suppression") refers to a group of auditory phenomena that is thought to be related to this ability. Traditionally, three measures have been used to quantify the PE: (1) Fusion: at short delays (1-5 ms for clicks) the lead and lag perceptually fuse into one auditory event; (2) Localization dominance: the perceived location of the leading source dominates that of the lagging source; and (3) Discrimination suppression: at short delays, changes in the location or interaural parameters of the lag are difficult to discriminate compared with changes in characteristics of the lead. Little is known about the relation among these aspects of the PE, since they are rarely studied in the same listeners. In the present study, extensive measurements of these phenomena were made for six normal-hearing listeners using 1-ms noise bursts. The results suggest that, for clicks, fusion lasts 1-5 ms; by 5 ms most listeners hear two sounds on a majority of trials. However, localization dominance and discrimination suppression remain potent for delays of 10 ms or longer. Results are consistent with a simple model in which information from the lead and lag interacts perceptually and in which the strength of this interaction decreases with spatiotemporal separation of the lead and lag. At short delays, lead and lag both contribute to spatial perception, but the lead dominates (to the extent that only one position is ever heard). At the longest delays tested, two distinct sounds are perceived (as measured in a fusion task), but they are not always heard at independent spatial locations (as measured in a localization dominance task). These results suggest that directional cues from the lag are not necessarily salient for all conditions in which the lag is subjectively heard as a separate event.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11206163     DOI: 10.1121/1.1328792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  21 in total

1.  The effect of an additional reflection in a precedence effect experiment.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Gongqiang Yu; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Lateralization of noise-burst trains based on onset and ongoing interaural delays.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Uma Balakrishnan; Patrick M Zurek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Localization interference between components in an auditory scene.

Authors:  Adrian K C Lee; Ade Deane-Pratt; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Failure of the precedence effect with a noise-band vocoder.

Authors:  Bernhard U Seeber; Ervin R Hafter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Isolating mechanisms that influence measures of the precedence effect: theoretical predictions and behavioral tests.

Authors:  Jing Xia; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  The precedence effect in sound localization.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; G Christopher Stecker; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-12-06

7.  Physiological and psychophysical modeling of the precedence effect.

Authors:  Jing Xia; Andrew Brughera; H Steven Colburn; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-04-01

8.  A precedence effect underlies preferences for calls with leading pulses in the grey treefrog, Hyla versicolor.

Authors:  Vincent T Marshall; H Carl Gerhardt
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  The precedence effect: fusion and lateralization measures for headphone stimuli lateralized by interaural time and level differences.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The contributions of onset and offset echo delays to auditory spatial perception in human listeners.

Authors:  Jeff M Donovan; Brian S Nelson; Terry T Takahashi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.