Literature DB >> 11206087

Genetic and environmental causes of covariation in interview assessments of disruptive behavior in child and adolescent twins.

L Eaves1, M Rutter, J L Silberg, L Shillady, H Maes, A Pickles.   

Abstract

Multirater, face-to-face, interview data relating to conduct disorder (CD), oppositional-defiant disorder (ODD), and inattentive, impulsive, and hyperactive components of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in a population-based sample of 1376 pairs of 8- to 16-year-old MZ and DZ twins are analyzed to examine (1) the genetic and environmental causes of correlation among ratings of ODD and CD symptoms and (2) the pattern of genetic and environmental correlation among the three components of ADHD. Parental ratings of ADHD showed marked sibling contrast effects, specific within raters but partly common across components. After these effects were removed, there was a modest genetic correlation between maternal and paternal ratings, but genetic effects were virtually uncorrelated across boys and girls. Genetic correlations among inattention, impulsivity, and hyperactivity were all large but fell well short of unity. There was little evidence that counts of symptoms of CD and ODD were genetically independent but the genetic correlations among ratings of twins, mothers, and fathers were all relatively modest. ODD and CD showed much higher genetic correlations across sexes than did the measures of ADHD. There was no evidence of rater contrast effects or of shared family environment influences in the twin resemblance for ODD and CD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11206087     DOI: 10.1023/a:1026553518272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Genet        ISSN: 0001-8244            Impact factor:   2.805


  28 in total

1.  Sources of covariation among the child-externalizing disorders: informant effects and the shared environment.

Authors:  S Alexandra Burt; Matt McGue; Robert F Krueger; William G Iacono
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.723

2.  Context specificity in stability of hyperactivity-impulsivity.

Authors:  J Kim; K Deater-Deckard; P Y Mullineaux; C R Beekman
Journal:  Eur J Pers       Date:  2010-12

3.  A twin study of ADHD symptoms in early adolescence: hyperactivity-impulsivity and inattentiveness show substantial genetic overlap but also genetic specificity.

Authors:  Corina U Greven; Frühling V Rijsdijk; Robert Plomin
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2011-02

4.  Genetic and environmental influences on impulsivity: a meta-analysis of twin, family and adoption studies.

Authors:  Serena Bezdjian; Laura A Baker; Catherine Tuvblad
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2011-07-29

Review 5.  Prevention of serious conduct problems in youth with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Miguel T Villodas; Linda J Pfiffner; Keith McBurnett
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.618

Review 6.  Phenotypic and measurement influences on heritability estimates in childhood ADHD.

Authors:  Christine M Freitag; Luis A Rohde; Thomas Lempp; Marcel Romanos
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2010-03-07       Impact factor: 4.785

7.  Is OPTAx useful for monitoring the effect of stimulants on hyperactivity and inattention? A brief report.

Authors:  Janne Tabori-Kraft; Merete Juul Sørensen; Martin Kaergaard; Søren Dalsgaard; Per Hove Thomsen
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 4.785

8.  Validity of the social responsiveness scale to differentiate between autism spectrum disorders and disruptive behaviour disorders.

Authors:  Hannah Cholemkery; Janina Kitzerow; Sonja Rohrmann; Christine M Freitag
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 4.785

9.  High heritability for a composite index of children's activity level measures.

Authors:  Alexis C Wood; Frühling Rijsdijk; Kimberly J Saudino; Philip Asherson; Jonna Kuntsi
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 2.805

10.  Actigraph data are reliable, with functional reliability increasing with aggregation.

Authors:  Alexis C Wood; Jonna Kuntsi; Philip Asherson; Kimberly J Saudino
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2008-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.