Literature DB >> 11205973

Contrast sensitivity function and image discrimination.

E Peli1.   

Abstract

A previous study tested the validity of simulations of the appearance of a natural image (from different observation distances) generated by using a visual model and contrast sensitivity functions of the individual observers [J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13, 1131 (1996)]. Deleting image spatial-frequency components that should be undetectable made the simulations indistinguishable from the original images at distances larger than the simulated distance. The simulated observation distance accurately predicted the distance at which the simulated image could be discriminated from the original image. Owing to the 1/f characteristic of natural images' spatial spectra, the individual contrast sensitivity functions (CSF's) used in the simulations of the previous study were actually tested only over a narrow range of retinal spatial frequencies. To test the CSF's over a wide range of frequencies, the same simulations and testing procedure were applied to five contrast versions of the images (10-300%). This provides a stronger test of the model, of the simulations, and specifically of the CSF's used. The relevant CSF for a discrimination task was found to be obtained by using 1-octave Gabor stimuli measured in a contrast detection task. The relevant CSF data had to be measured over a range of observation distances, owing to limitations of the displays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11205973     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.18.000283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of the channelized Hotelling observer with an internal-noise model in a train-test paradigm for cardiac SPECT defect detection.

Authors:  Jovan G Brankov
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  IMAGE ENHANCEMENT FOR IMPAIRED VISION: THE CHALLENGE OF EVALUATION.

Authors:  Eli Peli; Russell L Woods
Journal:  Int J Artif Intell Tools       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.208

3.  Electronic magnification and perceived contrast of video.

Authors:  Andrew Haun; Russell L Woods; Eli Peli
Journal:  J Soc Inf Disp       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 2.140

4.  Effects of contour enhancement on low-vision preference and visual search.

Authors:  Premnandhini Satgunam; Russell L Woods; Gang Luo; P Matthew Bronstad; Zachary Reynolds; Chaithanya Ramachandra; Bartlett W Mel; Eli Peli
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  An augmented-reality edge enhancement application for Google Glass.

Authors:  Alex D Hwang; Eli Peli
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Digital Enhancement of Television Signals for People with Visual Impairments: Evaluation of a Consumer Product.

Authors:  Matthew Fullerton; Eli Peli
Journal:  J Soc Inf Disp       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.140

7.  Measuring perceived video quality of MPEG enhancement by people with impaired vision.

Authors:  Matthew Fullerton; Russell L Woods; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz; Eli Peli
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  The influences of face inversion and facial expression on sensitivity to eye contact in high-functioning adults with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Mark D Vida; Daphne Maurer; Andrew J Calder; Gillian Rhodes; Jennifer A Walsh; Matthew V Pachai; M D Rutherford
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2013-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.