Literature DB >> 11204041

Electrotactile adaptation on the abdomen: preliminary results.

K A Kaczmarek1.   

Abstract

Electrotactile (electrocutaneous) stimulation at currents greater than sensation threshold causes sensory adaptation, which temporarily raises the sensation threshold and reduces the perceived magnitude of stimulation. After 15 min of moderately intense exposure to a conditioning stimulus (10 s on, 10 s off), the sensation threshold elevation for seven observers was 60-270%, depending on the current, frequency, and number of pulses in the burst structure of the conditioning stimulus. Increases in any of these parameters increased the sensation threshold elevation. Adaptation and recovery were each complete in approximately 15 min.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11204041     DOI: 10.1109/86.895953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng        ISSN: 1063-6528


  7 in total

1.  Interaction of Perceived Frequency and Intensity in Fingertip Electrotactile Stimulation: Dissimilarity Ratings and Multidimensional Scaling.

Authors:  Kurt A Kaczmarek; Mitchell E Tyler; Uchechukwu O Okpara; Steven J Haase
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.802

2.  Controlling sensation intensity for electrotactile stimulation in human-machine interfaces.

Authors:  Aadeel Akhtar; Joseph Sombeck; Brandon Boyce; Timothy Bretl
Journal:  Sci Robot       Date:  2018-04-25

3.  The tongue display unit (TDU) for electrotactile spatiotemporal pattern presentation.

Authors:  K A Kaczmarek
Journal:  Sci Iran D Comput Sci Eng Electr Eng       Date:  2011-12

4.  Sensory adaptation to electrical stimulation of the somatosensory nerves.

Authors:  Emily L Graczyk; Benoit P Delhaye; Matthew A Schiefer; Sliman J Bensmaia; Dustin J Tyler
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Electrotactile stimulation on the tongue: Intensity perception, discrimination, and cross-modality estimation.

Authors:  Cecil A Lozano; Kurt A Kaczmarek; Marco Santello
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.111

6.  Somatotopical feedback versus non-somatotopical feedback for phantom digit sensation on amputees using electrotactile stimulation.

Authors:  Dingguo Zhang; Heng Xu; Peter B Shull; Jianrong Liu; Xiangyang Zhu
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  Electrotactile Communication via Matrix Electrode Placed on the Torso Using Fast Calibration, and Static vs. Dynamic Encoding.

Authors:  Jovana Malešević; Miloš Kostić; Fabricio A Jure; Erika G Spaich; Strahinja Došen; Vojin Ilić; Goran Bijelić; Matija Štrbac
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-09       Impact factor: 3.847

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.