Literature DB >> 11202498

Negotiating false memories: interviewer and rememberer characteristics relate to memory distortion.

S Porter1, A R Birt, J C Yuille, D R Lehman.   

Abstract

In a recent study, more than half of the participants were led to create a partial or complete false memory for an emotional childhood event (e.g., serious animal attack). Using a subsample from that study, we examined the hypothesis that memory distortion is related to characteristics of interviewers and rememberers. The relations between susceptibility to memory distortion and (a) dissociation (Dissociative Experiences Scale) and (b) personality traits (NEO-Five Factor Inventory) were investigated. Results indicated that participants who exhibited memory distortion scored significantly higher on the dissociative scale than their counterparts who did not exhibit memory distortion. Further, susceptibility to memory distortion was associated with higher extraversion scores in interviewers and lower extraversion scores in participants. This pattern of findings suggests that false memories may derive from a social negotiation between particular interviewers and rememberers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11202498     DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  5 in total

Review 1.  False memories and fantastic beliefs: 15 years of the DRM illusion.

Authors:  David A Gallo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

2.  Habitual acceptance of misinformation: examination of individual differences and source attributions.

Authors:  David R Cann; Albert N Katz
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-04

3.  A few seemingly harmless routes to a false memory.

Authors:  Deryn Strange; Matthew P Gerrie; Maryanne Garry
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2005-08-17

4.  Source confusion influences the effectiveness of the autobiographical IAT.

Authors:  Melanie K T Takarangi; Deryn Strange; Alexandra E Shortland; Hannah E James
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

5.  Change deafness: the inability to detect changes between two voices.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.332

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.