Literature DB >> 11201411

Glenohumeral contact forces.

C Anglin1, U P Wyss, D R Pichora.   

Abstract

Glenohumeral contact forces have only been calculated previously either for simple abduction or for athletic activities. The objective of this study was to determine the glenohumeral contact forces for tasks which are demanding of the shoulder but which would commonly be performed by older people. The functional tasks chosen were using the arms to stand up from and sit down into a chair, walking with a cane, lifting a 5 kg box to shoulder height with both hands, and lifting a 10 kg suitcase. The trunk angles, arm angles and hand loads of six healthy subjects, average age 55 years, were recorded. This information was input into a biomechanical computer model which optimized the muscle force distribution by minimizing the sum of squared muscle stresses subject to constraints on the maximum muscle forces and maintaining the direction of the resultant force within the glenoid fossa. Average contact forces ranged from 1.3 to 2.4 times body weight (930-1720 N), the highest force being for lifting a suitcase. This latter value would be even higher if lifting either a greater load or to a greater height. Thus, contact forces at the shoulder should not be underestimated. This study provides functionally relevant contact forces which can be used for mechanical testing or finite element modelling of shoulder prostheses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11201411     DOI: 10.1243/0954411001535660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H        ISSN: 0954-4119            Impact factor:   1.617


  12 in total

1.  Moment arms of the muscles crossing the anatomical shoulder.

Authors:  David C Ackland; Ponnaren Pak; Martin Richardson; Marcus G Pandy
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Stability of two versus three peripheral pegs of the glenoid component in modern total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Eugene F Stautberg; Daniel C Jupiter; Arsalan Amin; Ali A Qadeer; Omer A Ilahi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  [Biomechanical investigation of fixed-angle plate osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus].

Authors:  G Röderer; M AbouElsoud; F Gebhard; L Claes; A J Aschoff; L Kinzl
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Quantifying the competing relationship between adduction range of motion and baseplate micromotion with lateralization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Josie Elwell; Joseph Choi; Ryan Willing
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Modeling a rotator cuff tear: Individualized shoulder muscle forces influence glenohumeral joint contact force predictions.

Authors:  Meghan E Vidt; Anthony C Santago; Anthony P Marsh; Eric J Hegedus; Christopher J Tuohy; Gary G Poehling; Michael T Freehill; Michael E Miller; Katherine R Saul
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 2.063

6.  Stress distribution in the humerus during elevation of the arm and external abduction.

Authors:  V Filardi
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-02-04

7.  In vitro comparison of wear characteristics of PyroCarbon and metal on bone: Shoulder hemiarthroplasty.

Authors:  Jerome J Klawitter; Jason Patton; Robert More; Noel Peter; Evgeny Podnos; Mark Ross
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-09-11

8.  Intramedullary cortical bone strut improves the cyclic stability of osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Chih-Kun Hsiao; Yi-Jung Tsai; Cheng-Yo Yen; Cheng-Hung Lee; Teng-Yao Yang; Yuan-Kun Tu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Impact of Modeling Assumptions on Stability Predictions in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mehul A Dharia; Jeffrey E Bischoff; David Schneider
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Analysis of shoulder compressive and shear forces during functional activities of daily life.

Authors:  Christian Klemt; Joe A Prinold; Sharon Morgans; Samuel H L Smith; Daniel Nolte; Peter Reilly; Anthony M J Bull
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.