Literature DB >> 11199155

Evaluating mutant mice: anatomic pathology.

C Brayton1, M Justice, C A Montgomery.   

Abstract

As the human and mouse genome projects approach their goals, initiatives in functional genomics are advancing. When the nucleotide sequences are available, identification of gene functions will assume even greater importance. Determination of gene products and their proximal biochemical functions provide a part of the picture, but determination of their functions in the context of the whole organism is the ultimate goal. The manipulated mouse genome has become accepted as a model for understanding the genetic basis of human conditions and diseases. Consequently, biomedical research institutions have seen significant increases in the use of mice since the early 1980s, and these increases are largely attributable to the use of genetically modified mice. The role of comparative pathology in research on mutant mouse models of disease is increasing in response to these trends. Evaluation and phenotypic characterization of mutant mice, via clinical and anatomic pathology techniques, will be an important component of functional genomics initiatives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11199155     DOI: 10.1354/vp.38-1-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Pathol        ISSN: 0300-9858            Impact factor:   2.221


  15 in total

Review 1.  3-dimensional imaging modalities for phenotyping genetically engineered mice.

Authors:  K A Powell; D Wilson
Journal:  Vet Pathol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 2.221

Review 2.  Designing phenotyping studies for genetically engineered mice.

Authors:  C J Zeiss; J M Ward; H G Allore
Journal:  Vet Pathol       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 2.221

3.  Repair deficient mice reveal mABH2 as the primary oxidative demethylase for repairing 1meA and 3meC lesions in DNA.

Authors:  Jeanette Ringvoll; Line M Nordstrand; Cathrine B Vågbø; Vivi Talstad; Karen Reite; Per Arne Aas; Knut H Lauritzen; Nina Beate Liabakk; Alexandra Bjørk; Richard William Doughty; Pål Ø Falnes; Hans E Krokan; Arne Klungland
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 4.  The state of the art of the zebrafish model for toxicology and toxicologic pathology research--advantages and current limitations.

Authors:  Jan M Spitsbergen; Michael L Kent
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.902

5.  Pathology Principles and Practices for Analysis of Animal Models.

Authors:  Sue E Knoblaugh; Tobias M Hohl; Krista M D La Perle
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2018-12-01

6.  Where's the mouse info?

Authors:  J P Sundberg; J M Ward; P Schofield
Journal:  Vet Pathol       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 2.221

Review 7.  Principles for valid histopathologic scoring in research.

Authors:  K N Gibson-Corley; A K Olivier; D K Meyerholz
Journal:  Vet Pathol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 2.221

8.  A phenotype survey of 36 mutant mouse strains with gene-targeted defects in glycosyltransferases or glycan-binding proteins.

Authors:  Sally L Orr; Dzung Le; Jeffrey M Long; Peter Sobieszczuk; Bo Ma; Hua Tian; Xiaoqun Fang; James C Paulson; Jamey D Marth; Nissi Varki
Journal:  Glycobiology       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 4.313

9.  Practical pathology of aging mice.

Authors:  Christina Pettan-Brewer; Piper M Treuting
Journal:  Pathobiol Aging Age Relat Dis       Date:  2011-06-01

10.  Pathology is a critical aspect of preclinical aging studies.

Authors:  Warren Ladiges; Yuji Ikeno; Denny Liggitt; Piper M Treuting
Journal:  Pathobiol Aging Age Relat Dis       Date:  2013-08-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.