Literature DB >> 11190042

The role of anisometropia in the development of accommodative esotropia.

D R Weakley1, E Birch.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if anisometropia increases the risk for the development of accommodative esotropia in hypermetropia.
METHODS: Records of all new patients with a refractive error of > or = +2.00 (mean spherical equivalent [SE] of both eyes) over a 42-month period were reviewed. Three hundred forty-five (345) patients were thus analyzed to determine the effect of anisometropia (> or = 1 diopter [D]) on the relative risk of developing esodeviation and of requiring surgical correction once esodeviation was present (uncontrolled deviation).
RESULTS: Anisometropia (> or = 1 D) increased the relative risk of developing accommodative esodeviation to 1.68 (P < .05). Anisometropia (> or = 1 D) increased the relative risk for esodeviation to 7.8 (P < .05) in patients with a mean SE of < 3 D and to 1.49 (P < .05) in patients with SE of > or = 3 D. This difference was significant (P = .016). In patients with esotropia and anisometropia (> or = 1 D), the relative risk for an uncontrolled deviation was 1.72 (P < .05) compared with nonanisometropic esotropic patients. Uncontrolled esodeviation was present in 33% of anisometropic patients versus 0% of nonanisometropic patients with a mean hypermetropic SE of < 3 D (P = .003); however, anisometropia did not increase the relative risk of uncontrolled esotropia in patients with SE of > or = 3 D. Although amblyopia and anisometropia were closely associated, anisometropia increased the relative risk of esodeviation to 2.14 (P < .05) even in the absence of amblyopia.
CONCLUSIONS: Anisometropia (> 1 D) is a significant risk factor for the development of accommodative esodeviation, especially in patients with lower overall hypermetropia (< 3 D). Anisometropia also increases the risk that an accommodative esodeviation will not be fully eliminated with hypermetropic correction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11190042      PMCID: PMC1298213     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc        ISSN: 0065-9533


  12 in total

1.  Abnormal accommodative convergence in squint.

Authors:  M M PARKS
Journal:  AMA Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1958-03

2.  The association between anisometropia, amblyopia, and binocularity in the absence of strabismus.

Authors:  D R Weakley
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1999

3.  Accommodative convergence in hypermetropia.

Authors:  G K von Noorden; C W Avilla
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-09-15       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Early-onset accommodative esotropia.

Authors:  J D Baker; M M Parks
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Etiologic factors in accommodative esodeviation.

Authors:  E L Raab
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1982

6.  Accommodative esotropia during the first year of life.

Authors:  Z F Pollard
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1976-11

7.  Cycloplegic refractions in infants and young children.

Authors:  A B Fulton; V Dobson; D Salem; C Mar; R A Petersen; R M Hansen
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Rate of deterioration in accommodative esotropia correlated to the AC/A relationship.

Authors:  I H Ludwig; M M Parks; P R Getson; L A Kammerman
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  1988 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.402

9.  The deterioration of accommodative esotropia: frequency, characteristics, and predictive factors.

Authors:  C F Dickey; W E Scott
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.402

10.  Binocularity in accommodative esotropia.

Authors:  M E Wilson; E C Bluestein; M M Parks
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.402

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Why do only some hyperopes become strabismic?

Authors:  Erin Babinsky; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  The relationship between anisometropia, patient age, and the development of amblyopia.

Authors:  Sean P Donahue
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2005

3.  Risk factors associated with childhood strabismus: the multi-ethnic pediatric eye disease and Baltimore pediatric eye disease studies.

Authors:  Susan A Cotter; Rohit Varma; Kristina Tarczy-Hornoch; Roberta McKean-Cowdin; Jesse Lin; Ge Wen; Jolyn Wei; Mark Borchert; Stanley P Azen; Mina Torres; James M Tielsch; David S Friedman; Michael X Repka; Joanne Katz; Josephine Ibironke; Lydia Giordano
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 4.  The relationship between anisometropia and amblyopia.

Authors:  Brendan T Barrett; Arthur Bradley; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 21.198

5.  Emmetropization, visual acuity, and strabismus outcomes among hyperopic infants followed with partial hyperopic corrections given in accordance with dynamic retinoscopy.

Authors:  D Somer; E Karabulut; F G Cinar; U E Altiparmak; N Unlu
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Longitudinal Development of Refractive Error in Children With Accommodative Esotropia: Onset, Amblyopia, and Anisometropia.

Authors:  Jingyun Wang; Sarah E Morale; Xiaowei Ren; Eileen E Birch
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 4.799

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.