Literature DB >> 21856012

Risk factors associated with childhood strabismus: the multi-ethnic pediatric eye disease and Baltimore pediatric eye disease studies.

Susan A Cotter1, Rohit Varma, Kristina Tarczy-Hornoch, Roberta McKean-Cowdin, Jesse Lin, Ge Wen, Jolyn Wei, Mark Borchert, Stanley P Azen, Mina Torres, James M Tielsch, David S Friedman, Michael X Repka, Joanne Katz, Josephine Ibironke, Lydia Giordano.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate risk factors associated with esotropia or exotropia in infants and young children.
DESIGN: Population-based cross-sectional prevalence study. PARTICIPANTS: Population-based samples of 9970 children 6 to 72 months of age from California and Maryland.
METHODS: Participants were preschool African-American, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic white children participating in the Multi-Ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study and the Baltimore Eye Disease Study. Data were obtained by parental interview and ocular examination. Odd ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to evaluate the association of demographic, behavioral, and clinical risk factors with esotropia and exotropia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Odds ratios (ORs) for various risk factors associated with esotropia or exotropia diagnosis based on cover testing.
RESULTS: In multivariate logistic regression analysis, esotropia was associated independently with prematurity, maternal smoking during pregnancy, older preschool age (48-72 months), anisometropia, and hyperopia. There was a severity-dependent association of hyperopia with the prevalence of esotropia, with ORs increasing from 6.4 for 2.00 diopters (D) to less than 3.00 D of hyperopia, to 122.0 for 5.00 D or more of hyperopia. Exotropia was associated with prematurity, maternal smoking during pregnancy, family history of strabismus, female sex, astigmatism (OR, 2.5 for 1.50 to <2.50 D of astigmatism, and 5.9 for ≥2.5 D of astigmatism), and anisoastigmatism in the J0 component (OR, ≥2 for J0 anisoastigmatism of ≥0.25 D).
CONCLUSIONS: Prematurity and maternal smoking during pregnancy are associated with a higher risk of having esotropia and exotropia. Refractive error is associated in a severity-dependent manner to the prevalence of esotropia and exotropia. Because refractive error is correctable, these risk associations should be considered when developing guidelines for the screening and management of refractive error in infants and young children. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21856012      PMCID: PMC3208120          DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.06.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  66 in total

1.  Computerized method of visual acuity testing: adaptation of the amblyopia treatment study visual acuity testing protocol.

Authors:  P S Moke; A H Turpin; R W Beck; J M Holmes; M X Repka; E E Birch; R W Hertle; R T Kraker; J M Miller; C A Johnson
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  The amblyopia treatment study visual acuity testing protocol.

Authors:  J M Holmes; R W Beck; M X Repka; D A Leske; R T Kraker; R C Blair; P S Moke; E E Birch; R A Saunders; R W Hertle; G E Quinn; K A Simons; J M Miller
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-09

3.  Preschool vision screening: what should we be detecting and how should we report it? Uniform guidelines for reporting results of preschool vision screening studies.

Authors:  Sean P Donahue; Robert W Arnold; James B Ruben
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.220

4.  A longitudinal study of children with a family history of strabismus: factors determining the incidence of strabismus.

Authors:  E Aurell; K Norrsell
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Common forms of childhood esotropia.

Authors:  B G Mohney
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  The impact of modest prematurity on visual function at age 6 years: findings from a population-based study.

Authors:  Dana Robaei; Annette Kifley; Glen A Gole; Paul Mitchell
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-06

7.  A population-based study of ocular abnormalities in premature children aged 5 to 10 years.

Authors:  J E Gallo; G Lennerstrand
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-05-15       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Incidence and types of childhood esotropia: a population-based study.

Authors:  Amy E Greenberg; Brian G Mohney; Nancy N Diehl; James P Burke
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  The association between maternal smoking in pregnancy, other early life characteristics and childhood vision: the Twins Eye Study in Tasmania.

Authors:  A L Ponsonby; S A Brown; L S Kearns; J R MacKinnon; L W Scotter; J A Cochrane; D A Mackey
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.648

10.  Prevalence of and early-life influences on childhood strabismus: findings from the Millennium Cohort Study.

Authors:  Sophia Pathai; Phillippa M Cumberland; Jugnoo S Rahi
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2010-03
View more
  43 in total

1.  Five things to know about...Esotropia.

Authors:  Sean A Kennedy; Jason Noble; Agnes M F Wong
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Why do only some hyperopes become strabismic?

Authors:  Erin Babinsky; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  A study of consanguineous marriage as a risk factor for developing comitant strabismus.

Authors:  Mansooreh Bagheri; Majid Farvardin; Mostafa Saadat
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2015-02-03

4.  Prognostic factors for recurrence after bilateral rectus recession procedure in patients with intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  S H Lim; B S Hwang; M M Kim
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Associations between hyperopia and other vision and refractive error characteristics.

Authors:  Marjean Taylor Kulp; Gui-Shuang Ying; Jiayan Huang; Maureen Maguire; Graham Quinn; Elise B Ciner; Lynn A Cyert; Deborah A Orel-Bixler; Bruce D Moore
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Accuracy of noncycloplegic retinoscopy, retinomax autorefractor, and SureSight vision screener for detecting significant refractive errors.

Authors:  Marjean Taylor Kulp; Gui-Shuang Ying; Jiayan Huang; Maureen Maguire; Graham Quinn; Elise B Ciner; Lynn A Cyert; Deborah A Orel-Bixler; Bruce D Moore
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Visual Function of Moderately Hyperopic 4- and 5-Year-Old Children in the Vision in Preschoolers - Hyperopia in Preschoolers Study.

Authors:  Elise B Ciner; Marjean Taylor Kulp; Maureen G Maguire; Maxwell Pistilli; T Rowan Candy; Bruce Moore; Gui-Shuang Ying; Graham Quinn; Gale Orlansky; Lynn Cyert
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Spectacle correction versus no spectacles for prevention of strabismus in hyperopic children.

Authors:  Lisa Jones-Jordan; Xue Wang; Roberta W Scherer; Donald O Mutti
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-02

Review 9.  Amblyopia and binocular vision.

Authors:  Eileen E Birch
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 21.198

10.  Comitant strabismus: Perspectives, present and future.

Authors:  Darren T Oystreck; Christopher J Lyons
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-05-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.