Literature DB >> 8410574

Binocularity in accommodative esotropia.

M E Wilson1, E C Bluestein, M M Parks.   

Abstract

One hundred twenty-seven medical records of patients with accommodative esotropia met our inclusion criteria and were analyzed. All included patients were within 10 prism diopters of orthophoria and had stereopsis and other binocular sensory test results recorded at their latest visit. Bifixation, defined as stereopsis of 50 arc seconds or better, was present in 31 patients (24%) with an average follow up of 89 months. Monofixation (peripheral fusion) was present in the remaining 96 patients (76%) with an average follow up of 84 months. Patients with bifixation were less likely to have presented with constant esotropia (19% vs 39% [P = .04]) and were more likely to be aligned within 8 delta of orthophoria in their first glasses (84% vs 21% [P < .0001]). No patient with bifixation had constant esotropia longer than 4 months. In addition, patients with bifixation were less likely to have worn bifocals (39% vs 59% [P = .09]), or undergone esotropia surgery (23% vs 62% [P < .0001]). These data suggest that maintenance of bifixation is possible in accommodative esotropia if the eyes are straightened before or shortly after the esodeviation becomes constant. With this early therapy, amblyopia and deterioration of ocular alignment are also less likely.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8410574     DOI: 10.3928/0191-3913-19930701-04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus        ISSN: 0191-3913            Impact factor:   1.402


  9 in total

1.  The influence of refractive error management on the natural history and treatment outcome of accommodative esotropia (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Bradley Charles Black
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2006

2.  Weaning children with accommodative esotropia out of spectacles: a pilot study.

Authors:  K A Hutcheson; N J Ellish; S R Lambert
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Recovery in microtropia: implications for aetiology and neurophysiology.

Authors:  M Cleary; C A Houston; R M McFadzean; G N Dutton
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Clinical characteristics of microtropia--is microtropia a fixed phenomenon?

Authors:  C A Houston; M Cleary; G N Dutton; R M McFadzean
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Outcome in refractive accommodative esotropia.

Authors:  A Mulvihill; A MacCann; I Flitcroft; M O'Keefe
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  The role of anisometropia in the development of accommodative esotropia.

Authors:  D R Weakley; E Birch
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2000

7.  The decompensated monofixation syndrome (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  R Michael Siatkowski
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2011-12

8.  Long-term study of accommodative esotropia.

Authors:  Irene H Ludwig; Susan P Imberman; Hilary W Thompson; Marshall M Parks
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2003

9.  Factors Affecting Binocular Sensorial Function in Accommodative Esotropia.

Authors:  Sezin Akca Bayar; Zeynep Kayaarasi Ozturker; Burak Ulas; Sibel Oto; Aysel Pelit; Seval Akgun
Journal:  Beyoglu Eye J       Date:  2021-09-27
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.