Literature DB >> 18457754

Women and men with coronary heart disease in three countries: are they treated differently?

Markus Bönte1, Olaf von dem Knesebeck, Johannes Siegrist, Lisa Marceau, Carol Link, Sara Arber, Ann Adams, John B McKinlay.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nonmedical determinants of medical decision making were investigated in an international research project in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany. The key question in this paper is whether and to what extent doctors' diagnostic and therapeutic decisions in coronary heart disease (CHD) are influenced by patient gender.
METHODS: A factorial experiment with a videotaped patient consultation was conducted. Professional actors played the role of patients with symptoms of CHD. Several alternative versions were taped featuring the same script with patient-actors of different gender, age, race, and socioeconomic status. The videotapes were presented to a randomly selected sample of 128 primary care physicians in each country. Using an interview with standardized and open-ended questions, physicians were asked how they would diagnose and treat such a patient after they had seen the video.
RESULTS: Results show gender differences in the diagnostic strategies of the doctors. Women were asked different questions, CHD was mentioned more often as a possible diagnosis for men than for women, and physicians were less certain about their diagnosis with female patients. Gender differences in management decisions (therapy and lifestyle advice) are less pronounced and less consistent than in diagnostic decisions. Magnitude of gender effect on doctors' decisions varies between countries with smaller influences in the United States.
CONCLUSION: Although patients with identical symptoms were presented, primary care doctors' behavior differed by patients' gender in all 3 countries under study. These gender differences suggest that women may be less likely to receive an accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment than men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18457754      PMCID: PMC3963431          DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2008.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Womens Health Issues        ISSN: 1049-3867


  28 in total

1.  Confronting competing demands to improve quality: a five-country hospital survey.

Authors:  Robert J Blendon; Cathy Schoen; Catherine M DesRoches; Robin Osborn; Kinga Zapert; Elizabeth Raleigh
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Patient characteristics and inequalities in doctors' diagnostic and management strategies relating to CHD: a video-simulation experiment.

Authors:  Sara Arber; John McKinlay; Ann Adams; Lisa Marceau; Carol Link; Amy O'Donnell
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Interviewer effects in a cohort study. Results from the Massachusetts Women's Health Study.

Authors:  C B Johannes; S L Crawford; J B McKinlay
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Differences in the management and prognosis of women and men who suffer from acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Sonia S Anand; Chang Chun Xie; Shamir Mehta; Maria Grazia Franzosi; Campbell Joyner; Susan Chrolavicius; Keith A A Fox; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Nonmedical influences on medical decision making: an experimental technique using videotapes, factorial design, and survey sampling.

Authors:  H A Feldman; J B McKinlay; D A Potter; K M Freund; R B Burns; M A Moskowitz; L E Kasten
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Primary care and health system performance: adults' experiences in five countries.

Authors:  Cathy Schoen; Robin Osborn; Phuong Trang Huynh; Michelle Doty; Karen Davis; Kinga Zapert; Jordon Peugh
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Jul-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Sex differences in myocardial infarction and coronary deaths in the Scottish MONICA population of Glasgow 1985 to 1991. Presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and 28-day case fatality of 3991 events in men and 1551 events in women.

Authors:  H Tunstall-Pedoe; C Morrison; M Woodward; B Fitzpatrick; G Watt
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Comparison of treatment and outcomes for patients with acute myocardial infarction in Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota, and Göteborg, Sweden.

Authors:  Johan Herlitz; Paul McGovern; Mikael Dellborg; Thomas Karlsson; Susan Duval; Björn W Karlson; Seungmin Lee; Russell V Luepker
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Women at risk of coronary heart disease experience barriers to diagnosis and treatment: a qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Jan C Frich; Kirsti Malterud; Per Fugelli
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.581

10.  Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study.

Authors:  Salim Yusuf; Steven Hawken; Stephanie Ounpuu; Tony Dans; Alvaro Avezum; Fernando Lanas; Matthew McQueen; Andrzej Budaj; Prem Pais; John Varigos; Liu Lisheng
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Sep 11-17       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  10 in total

1.  Gendered uncertainty and variation in physicians' decisions for coronary heart disease: the double-edged sword of "atypical symptoms".

Authors:  Lisa C Welch; Karen E Lutfey; Eric Gerstenberger; Matthew Grace
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2012-08-29

2.  Coverage of recommended vaccinations in subjects with diabetes mellitus and ischemic heart disease: results for women and men.

Authors:  Thomas Ernst Dorner; Eva Ràsky; Katharina Viktoria Stein; Willibald Julius Stronegger; Alexandra Kautzky-Willer; Anita Rieder
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2011-01-25

3.  Do physicians attend to base rates? Prevalence data and statistical discrimination in the diagnosis of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Nancy N Maserejian; Karen E Lutfey; John B McKinlay
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  [Diagnosis and therapy of depression in the elderly--influence of patient and physician characteristics].

Authors:  Olaf von dem Knesebeck; Markus Bönte; Johannes Siegrist; Lisa Marceau; Carol Link; John McKinlay
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol       Date:  2009-03-09

Review 5.  Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review.

Authors:  Chloë FitzGerald; Samia Hurst
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  Are there any differences in the provided burn care between men and women? A retrospective study.

Authors:  Laura Pompermaier; Moustafa Elmasry; Islam Abdelrahman; Mats Fredrikson; Folke Sjöberg; Ingrid Steinvall
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2018-08-13

7.  Country differences in the diagnosis and management of coronary heart disease - a comparison between the US, the UK and Germany.

Authors:  Olaf von dem Knesebeck; Markus Bönte; Johannes Siegrist; Lisa Marceau; Carol Link; Sara Arber; Ann Adams; John McKinlay
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-09-29       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Anxiolytic treatment but not anxiety itself causes hyponatremia among anxious patients.

Authors:  Mayan Gilboa; Gideon Koren; Racheli Katz; Cheli Melzer-Cohen; Varda Shalev; Ehud Grossman
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Age and gender differences in diagnostic decision-making of early heart failure: results of a mixed-methods interview-study using video vignettes.

Authors:  Gabriella Marx; Sarah Koens; Olaf von dem Knesebeck; Martin Scherer
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Gender differences in use of invasive diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for acute ischaemic heart disease in Chinese adults.

Authors:  Yiping Chen; Robert Clarke; Borislava Mihaylova; Muriel Levy; Yu Guo; Jun Lv; Canqing Yu; Liming Li; Zhengming Chen
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 7.365

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.