BACKGROUND: There are few reports which describe the management of unselected groups of patients with lung cancer. This study was undertaken to audit prospectively the presentation, diagnosis, management, and outcome of patients presenting with lung cancer in South East Scotland. METHODS: Data were recorded on all patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer who presented to a multidisciplinary group of clinicians over a 12 month period. Subsequent follow up data on treatment and survival were collected. RESULTS: Six hundred and twenty two patients were registered, 80% of whom were referred from primary care. There was a considerable variation in the length of history, but the diagnosis was rapidly made after referral (87% within two weeks). In 82% of patients the pathological examination was positive; 70% were treated with palliative intent. Only 36% of patients who underwent surgery had computed tomographic scanning and 55% had sampling of mediastinal nodes. A wide variety of regimens was used for treatment with radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and follow up data were difficult to obtain in these patients. Survival was poor in all patients treated with palliative intent. CONCLUSIONS: This audit confirms the importance of previously noted prognostic factors. Significant variation in referral practice, diagnostic and management evaluation has been shown. The data serve as a useful background for the formation of local management guidelines.
BACKGROUND: There are few reports which describe the management of unselected groups of patients with lung cancer. This study was undertaken to audit prospectively the presentation, diagnosis, management, and outcome of patients presenting with lung cancer in South East Scotland. METHODS: Data were recorded on all patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer who presented to a multidisciplinary group of clinicians over a 12 month period. Subsequent follow up data on treatment and survival were collected. RESULTS: Six hundred and twenty two patients were registered, 80% of whom were referred from primary care. There was a considerable variation in the length of history, but the diagnosis was rapidly made after referral (87% within two weeks). In 82% of patients the pathological examination was positive; 70% were treated with palliative intent. Only 36% of patients who underwent surgery had computed tomographic scanning and 55% had sampling of mediastinal nodes. A wide variety of regimens was used for treatment with radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and follow up data were difficult to obtain in these patients. Survival was poor in all patients treated with palliative intent. CONCLUSIONS: This audit confirms the importance of previously noted prognostic factors. Significant variation in referral practice, diagnostic and management evaluation has been shown. The data serve as a useful background for the formation of local management guidelines.
Authors: G J M Herder; P Verboom; E F Smit; P C M van Velthoven; J H A M van den Bergh; C D Colder; I van Mansom; J C van Mourik; P E Postmus; G J J Teule; O S Hoekstra Journal: Thorax Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Markus Glatzer; Achim Rittmeyer; Joachim Müller; Isabelle Opitz; Alexandros Papachristofilou; Ioannis Psallidas; Martin Früh; Diana Born; Paul Martin Putora Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2017-08-24 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: M L Cartman; A C Hatfield; M F Muers; M D Peake; R A Haward; D Forman Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: P P Melling; A C Hatfield; M F Muers; M D Peake; C J Storer; C E Round; R A Haward; S M Crawford Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2002-01-07 Impact factor: 7.640