Literature DB >> 11180226

Embryo implantation after biopsy of one or two cells from cleavage-stage embryos with a view to preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

H Van de Velde1, A De Vos, K Sermon, C Staessen, M De Rycke, E Van Assche, W Lissens, M Vandervorst, H Van Ranst, I Liebaers, A Van Steirteghem.   

Abstract

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) can be offered as an alternative to prenatal diagnosis (PND) to couples at risk of having a child with a genetic disease. The affected embryos are detected before implantation by fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) for sexing (X-linked diseases) and chromosomal disorders (numerical and structural) or by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for monogenic disorders (including some X-linked diseases). The accuracy and reliability of the diagnosis is increased by analysing two blastomeres of the embryo. However, the removal of two blastomeres might have an effect on the implantation capacity of the embryo. We have evaluated the implantation of embryos after the removal of one, two or three cells in 188 PGD cycles where a transfer was done. The patients were divided into five groups: a first group which received only embryos from which one cell had been removed, a second group which received only embryos from which two cells had been removed, a third group which received a mixture of embryos from which one and two cells had been taken, a fourth group where two and three cells had been removed, and a fifth group where three cells had been removed. The overall ongoing pregnancy rate per transfer was 26.1%, the overall implantation rate per transfer was 15.2% and the overall birth rate was 14.2%. Although pregnancy rates between the groups cannot be compared because the second group (two cells removed) contains more rapidly developing and therefore 'better quality' embryos, an ongoing pregnancy rate of 29.1% and an implantation rate of 18.6% per transferred embryo in this group is acceptable, and we therefore advise analysing two cells from a > or =7-cell stage embryo in order to render the diagnosis more accurate and reliable. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11180226     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0223(200012)20:13<1030::aid-pd977>3.0.co;2-d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  12 in total

Review 1.  Molecular diagnostics in preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Alan R Thornhill; Karen Snow
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 2.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis in clinical practice.

Authors:  E Kanavakis; J Traeger-Synodinos
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Viability of frozen-thawed human embryos with one-two blastomeres lysis.

Authors:  Xiaoying Zheng; Ping Liu; Guian Chen; Jie Qiao; Yuqi Wu; Ming Fan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for chromosome rearrangements - one blastomere biopsy versus two blastomere biopsy.

Authors:  D Brodie; C E Beyer; E Osborne; V Kralevski; S Rasi; T Osianlis
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Higher degree of chromosome mosaicism in preimplantation embryos from carriers of robertsonian translocation t(13;14) in comparison with embryos from karyotypically normal IVF patients.

Authors:  Serena Emiliani; Eric Gonzalez-Merino; Marc Van den Bergh; Marc Abramowicz; Yvon Englert
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening by comprehensive molecular testing.

Authors:  Hiroki Kurahashi; Takema Kato; Jun Miyazaki; Haruki Nishizawa; Eiji Nishio; Hiroshi Furukawa; Hironori Miyamura; Mayuko Ito; Toshiaki Endo; Yuya Ouchi; Hidehito Inagaki; Takuma Fujii
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2015-07-14

7.  Are poor responders patients at higher risk for producing aneuploid embryos in vitro?

Authors:  Amanda Souza Setti; Daniela Paes de Almeida Ferreira Braga; Rita de Cássia Savio Figueira; Matheus de Castro Azevedo; Assumpto Iaconelli; Edson Borges
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 8.  Preimplantation genetic testing: indications and controversies.

Authors:  Amber R Cooper; Emily S Jungheim
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 1.935

9.  Incidence of chromosomal mosaicism in morphologically normal nonhuman primate preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  Cathérine Dupont; James Segars; Alan DeCherney; Barry D Bavister; D Randall Armant; Carol A Brenner
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  In vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection for male infertility.

Authors:  Rubina Merchant; Goral Gandhi; Gautam N Allahbadia
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2011-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.