Literature DB >> 21110079

Are poor responders patients at higher risk for producing aneuploid embryos in vitro?

Amanda Souza Setti1, Daniela Paes de Almeida Ferreira Braga, Rita de Cássia Savio Figueira, Matheus de Castro Azevedo, Assumpto Iaconelli, Edson Borges.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that aged women with poor ovarian response express an increase on embryo chromosomal alterations when compared to aged women who presented normal response.
METHODS: Couples undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles with preimplantation genetic screening, were subdivided into two groups: Poor Responder group (n = 34), patients who produced ≤4 oocytes; and Normoresponder group (n = 50), patients who produced ≥5 oocytes. Groups were compared regarding cycles' outcomes and aneuploidy frequency.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between and groups regarding the fertilization rate (p = 0.6861), clinical pregnancy (p = 0.9208), implantation (p = 0.6863), miscarriage (p = 0.6788) and the percentage of aneuploid embryos (p = 0.270). Embryo transfer rate was significantly lower on poor responder group (p = 0.0128) and logistic regression confirmed the influence of poor response on the chance of embryo transfer (p = 0.016).
CONCLUSIONS: Aged females responding poorly to gonadotrophins are not at a higher risk for producing aneuploid embryos in vitro.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21110079      PMCID: PMC3151354          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-010-9516-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  34 in total

1.  Age = egg quality, FSH level = egg quantity.

Authors:  James P Toner
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Chromosome mosaicism in cleavage-stage human embryos: evidence of a maternal age effect.

Authors:  Santiago Munné; Mireia Sandalinas; Tomas Escudero; Carmen Márquez; Jacques Cohen
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.828

3.  FISH analysis for chromosomes 13, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y in all blastomeres of IVF pre-embryos from 144 randomly selected donated human oocytes and impact on pre-embryo morphology.

Authors:  S Ziebe; K Lundin; A Loft; C Bergh; A Nyboe Andersen; U Selleskog; D Nielsen; C Grøndahl; H Kim; J-C Arce
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Reproductive outcome in patients with diminished ovarian reserve.

Authors:  A J Levi; M F Raynault; P A Bergh; M R Drews; B T Miller; R T Scott
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Preimplantation diagnosis for aneuploidies in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization with a poor prognosis: identification of the categories for which it should be proposed.

Authors:  L Gianaroli; M C Magli; A P Ferraretti; S Munné
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Embryo implantation after biopsy of one or two cells from cleavage-stage embryos with a view to preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  H Van de Velde; A De Vos; K Sermon; C Staessen; M De Rycke; E Van Assche; W Lissens; M Vandervorst; H Van Ranst; I Liebaers; A Van Steirteghem
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Is there a link between an extremely poor response to ovarian hyperstimulation and early ovarian failure?

Authors:  D Nikolaou; S Lavery; C Turner; R Margara; G Trew
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Defining poor ovarian response during IVF cycles, in women aged <40 years, and its relationship with treatment outcome.

Authors:  C Kailasam; S D Keay; P Wilson; W C L Ford; J M Jenkins
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 9.  PGD in 47,XXY Klinefelter's syndrome patients.

Authors:  C Staessen; H Tournaye; E Van Assche; A Michiels; L Van Landuyt; P Devroey; I Liebaers; A Van Steirteghem
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 15.610

10.  Poor response after hormonal stimulation for in vitro fertilization is not related to ovarian aging.

Authors:  Paul De Sutter; Marc Dhont
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  5 in total

1.  A chromosome 19 locus positively influences the number of retrieved oocytes during stimulated cycles in Brazilian women.

Authors:  Amanda Souza Setti; Sylvia Sanches Cortezzi; Rita de Cássia S Figueira; Ciro Dresch Martinhago; Daniela Paes de Almeida Ferreira Braga; Assumpto Iaconelli; Edson Borges
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Poor-responder patients do not benefit from intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection.

Authors:  Amanda Souza Setti; Daniela Paes Almeida Ferreira Braga; Rita Cassia Sávio Figueira; Assumpto Iaconelli; Edson Borges
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-01-18       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Maternal antimullerian hormone as a predictor of fetal aneuploidy occurring in an early pregnancy loss.

Authors:  So Hyun Shim; Hyeong In Ha; Yong Wook Jung; Sung Shin Shim; Yeon Kyung Cho; Ji Youn Kim; Kyoung Jin Lee; Dong Hyun Cha; Soo Hyun Kim; Hee Jin Park
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2015-11-16

4.  The effect of the pooling method on the live birth rate in poor ovarian responders according to the Bologna criteria.

Authors:  Serdar Çelik; Niyazi Emre Turgut; Dilek Cengiz Çelik; Kübra Boynukalın; Remzi Abalı; Sevim Purisa; Erbil Yağmur; Mustafa Bahçeci
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-03-29

Review 5.  Prospects of Germline Nuclear Transfer in Women With Diminished Ovarian Reserve.

Authors:  Antonia Christodoulaki; Annekatrien Boel; Maoxing Tang; Chloë De Roo; Dominic Stoop; Björn Heindryckx
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 5.555

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.