Literature DB >> 11179125

Cumulative and single-dose design to assess the bronchodilator effects of beta2-agonists in individuals with asthma.

D Fishwick1, L Bradshaw, C Macdonald, R Beasley, D Gash, T Bengtsson, E Bondesson, L Borgström.   

Abstract

With the development of different chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-free metered dose aerosol and dry powder devices, it is necessary to study and validate the methods used for assessing and comparing their efficacy. This study evaluated the cumulative dose design by determining the bronchodilator response to salbutamol given according to either a high or a low cumulative dose regimen. Adults with asthma (n = 24) were studied in a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, cross-over design. On separate days, cumulative doses of salbutamol (50+50+100+200 or 100+100+ 200+400 or 400+0+0+0 or 0+0+0+0 microg) were given via Turbuhaler with 30 min between doses. The two cumulative dose regimens produced almost identical bronchodilator responses at each time point. The relative dose-potency between the 800- and 400- microg cumulative dose regimens was 0.7 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.5-1.0, excluding the true value of 2. The 400-microg cumulative dose regimen resulted in a higher FEV1 at 115 min than the 400-microg single-dose regimen. There was no difference in the bronchodilator response to the single dose of 50, 100, or 400 microg of salbutamol after either 5 or 25 min. Thus, care should be exercised when using either a cumulative or single-dose design for comparing different beta2-agonists, or different inhalation devices, with respect to their relative dose-potency. In addition, this study provides further evidence that for short-acting beta2-agonists such as salbutamol, lower doses than those normally recommended may be used, and that repeated self-administration of low doses over a period of 60 min may give a better bronchodilator response than a single administration of a high dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11179125     DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.2.2003027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  9 in total

1.  Regulatory Considerations for Approval of Generic Inhalation Drug Products in the US, EU, Brazil, China, and India.

Authors:  Sau L Lee; Bhawana Saluja; Alfredo García-Arieta; Gustavo Mendes Lima Santos; Ying Li; Sarah Lu; Shuguang Hou; Juliet Rebello; Abhijit Vaidya; Jaideep Gogtay; Shrinivas Purandare; Svetlana Lyapustina
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Current Bronchodilator Responsiveness Criteria Underestimate Asthma in Older Adults.

Authors:  Rodrigo S Cavallazzi; Barbara J Polivka; Bryan L Beatty; Demetra E Antimisiaris; Rangaraj K Gopalraj; Rachel A Vickers-Smith; Rodney J Folz
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 2.258

3.  Speed of onset of bronchodilator response to salbutamol inhaled via different devices in asthmatics: a bioassay based on functional antagonism.

Authors:  Federico Lavorini; Pietro Geri; Laura Mariani; Cecilia Marmai; Nazzarena Maria Maluccio; Massimo Pistolesi; Giovanni A Fontana
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Clinical and functional responses to salbutamol inhaled via different devices in asthmatic patients with induced bronchoconstriction.

Authors:  Federico Lavorini; Pietro Geri; Martina Luperini; Nazzarena M Maluccio; Laura Mariani; Cecilia Marmai; Massimo Pistolesi; Giovanni A Fontana
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  Recovery from bronchoconstriction and bronchodilator tolerance.

Authors:  Sarah Haney; Robert J Hancox
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2006 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 8.667

6.  Does the inhalation device affect the bronchodilatory dose response curve of salbutamol in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients?

Authors:  Mariëlle E A C Broeders; Johan Molema; Wim C J Hop; Niek A Vermue; Hans T M Folgering
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Valved holding chamber drug delivery is dependent on breathing pattern and device design.

Authors:  Péter Csonka; Lauri Lehtimäki
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2019-02-04

Review 8.  The environmental impact of inhaled therapy: making informed treatment choices.

Authors:  Ashley Woodcock; Kai M Beeh; Hironori Sagara; Simon Aumônier; Emmanuel Addo-Yobo; Javaid Khan; Jørgen Vestbo; Helen Tope
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 33.795

Review 9.  A review of the in vitro and in vivo valved holding chamber (VHC) literature with a focus on the AeroChamber Plus Flow-Vu Anti-static VHC.

Authors:  Sanjeeva Dissanayake; Jason Suggett
Journal:  Ther Adv Respir Dis       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.031

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.