Literature DB >> 11178761

New adhesion formation after laparoscopic and conventional adhesiolysis: a comparative study in the rabbit.

A Tittel1, K H Treutner, S Titkova, A Ottinger, V Schumpelick.   

Abstract

This study aimed to compare new adhesion formation after laparoscopic and conventional adhesiolysis. In a first operation, 24 rabbits underwent fixation of deserosated cecum (6 cm2) to the lateral abdominal wall to induce standardized adhesions. After 4 weeks, adhesiolysis was performed by laparoscopy (n = 12) or laparotomy (n = 12). Outcome was assessed by the incidence, extent, and location of adhesion reformation. After conventional adhesiolysis, new adhesions developed in all the rabbits, as compared with 75% after laparoscopic adhesiolysis. The extent of newly formed adhesions was significantly reduced (p < 0.001) after laparoscopic adhesiolysis (368+/-115 mm2) as compared with conventional adhesiolysis (2434+/-245 mm2). There were no adhesions to trocar wounds, but adhesions to the abdominal incision were found in 33% of the conventional group. In a rabbit model comparing laparoscopic and conventional adhesiolysis in a standardized experimental setting, laparoscopic adhesiolysis is associated with a significantly reduced formation of new postoperative adhesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11178761     DOI: 10.1007/s004640000256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  17 in total

Review 1.  A unifying pathogenetic mechanism in the etiology of intraperitoneal adhesions;.

Authors:  R F Buckman; M Woods; L Sargent; A S Gervin
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 2.  Comparison of adhesion formation in open and laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  M Schäfer; L Krähenb hl; M W Büchler
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.588

3.  Peritoneal adhesions and their relation to abdominal surgery. A postmortem study.

Authors:  M A Weibel; G Majno
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Adhesion formation after transperitoneal nephrectomy: laparoscopic v open approach.

Authors:  R G Moore; A W Partin; J B Adams; L R Kavoussi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Effect of peritoneal trauma on peritoneal fibrinolytic activity and intraperitoneal adhesion formation. An experimental study in the rat.

Authors:  A T Raftery
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.745

6.  Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  H Ellis; B J Moran; J N Thompson; M C Parker; M S Wilson; D Menzies; A McGuire; A M Lower; R J Hawthorn; F O'Brien; S Buchan; A M Crowe
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  [Laparoscopy versus laparotomy. An animal experiment study comparing adhesion formation in the dog].

Authors:  A Tittel; E Schippers; K H Treutner; M Anuroff; M Polivoda; A Ottinger; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1994

8.  Operative laparoscopy versus open abdominal surgery: a comparative study on postoperative adhesion formation in the rat model.

Authors:  S Filmar; V Gomel; P F McComb
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Adhesion formation after laparoscopic surgery in tubal pregnancy: a randomized trial versus laparotomy.

Authors:  P Lundorff; M Hahlin; B Källfelt; J Thorburn; B Lindblom
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Is laparoscopy associated with a lower rate of postoperative adhesions than laparotomy? A comparative study in the rabbit.

Authors:  J O Jorgensen; N J Lalak; D R Hunt
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1995-05
View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Abdominal adhesions: intestinal obstruction, pain, and infertility.

Authors:  W W Vrijland; J Jeekel; H J van Geldorp; D J Swank; H J Bonjer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-14       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopy for benign colorectal diseases.

Authors:  Thomas Shin; Janice F Rafferty
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2010-02

3.  Fouling-resistant zwitterionic polymers for complete prevention of postoperative adhesion.

Authors:  Ershuai Zhang; Boyi Song; Yuanjie Shi; Hui Zhu; Xiangfei Han; Hong Du; Chengbiao Yang; Zhiqiang Cao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Long-term outcome, adhesions, and quality of life after laparoscopic and open surgical therapies for acute abdomen: follow-up of a prospective trial.

Authors:  W D Majewski
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-11-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  The role of laparoscopy in the management of acute small-bowel obstruction: a review of over 2,000 cases.

Authors:  Donal B O'Connor; Desmond C Winter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Biodegradable Zwitterionic Cream Gel for Effective Prevention of Postoperative Adhesion.

Authors:  Ershuai Zhang; Jianhai Yang; Ke Wang; Boyi Song; Hui Zhu; Xiangfei Han; Yuanjie Shi; Chengbiao Yang; Zhipeng Zeng; Zhiqiang Cao
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 18.808

7.  Preliminary study with SprayShield™ Adhesion Barrier System in the prevention of abdominal adhesions.

Authors:  Tomasz Banasiewicz; Karolina Horbacka; Jacek Karoń; Stanisław Malinger; Frantisek Antos; Sławomir Rudzki; Zdenek Kala; Zoran Stojcev; Jyrki Kössi; Piotr Krokowicz
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 1.195

8.  Laparoscopy vs. laparotomy for embryo transfer to produce transgenic goats (Capra hircus).

Authors:  Sang Tae Shin; Sung Keun Jang; Hong Suk Yang; Ok Keun Lee; Yhong Hee Shim; Won Il Choi; Doo Soo Lee; Gwan Sun Lee; Jong Ki Cho; Young Won Lee
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.672

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.