Literature DB >> 11177640

Goal-Directed Aiming: Correcting a Force-Specification Error With the Right and Left Hands.

Digby Elliott1, Matthew Heath, Gordon Binsted, Kathryn L. Ricker, Eric A. Roy, Romeo Chua.   

Abstract

In 2 experiments, the authors examined manual aiming asymmetries as well as the ability of participants to adjust their aiming trajectories following an unexpected change to the inertial resistance to movement. In Experiment 1, participants (N = 11) were able to rapidly adjust their movement trajectories to conform to the new movement requirements. They were faster and more consistent when aiming with their right hand than with their left hand, regardless of whether or not the movement was perturbed. In Experiment 2, participants' (N = 11) vision of the hand was manipulated so that the role of visual feedback in the corrective process could be examined. Vision had an impact not only on performance but also on the characteristics of the movement trajectories. Manual asymmetries in aiming were associated with a right hand superiority during the final corrective stages of the movement.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 11177640     DOI: 10.1080/00222899909600997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  18 in total

1.  Can the motor system resolve a premovement bias in grip aperture? Online analysis of grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Christina Rival; Gordon Binsted
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-27       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Beside the point: motor adaptation without feedback-based error correction in task-irrelevant conditions.

Authors:  Sydney Y Schaefer; Iris L Shelly; Kurt A Thoroughman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Reaching to recover balance in unpredictable circumstances: is online visual control of the reach-to-grasp reaction necessary or sufficient?

Authors:  Kenneth C Cheng; Sandra M McKay; Emily C King; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Hemispheric asymmetries of motor versus nonmotor processes during (visuo)motor control.

Authors:  Dorothée V Callaert; Katrien Vercauteren; Ronald Peeters; Fred Tam; Simon Graham; Stephan P Swinnen; Stefan Sunaert; Nicole Wenderoth
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Upper limb asymmetries in the utilization of proprioceptive feedback.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; Colleen A Lewis; Susan H Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-26       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  A lower visual field advantage for endpoint stability but no advantage for online movement precision.

Authors:  Olav Krigolson; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-25       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Task-dependent asymmetries in the utilization of proprioceptive feedback for goal-directed movement.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; Susan H Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Goal-directed reaching: movement strategies influence the weighting of allocentric and egocentric visual cues.

Authors:  Kristina A Neely; Ayla Tessmer; Gordon Binsted; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Effector mass and trajectory optimization in the online regulation of goal-directed movement.

Authors:  James J Burkitt; Victoria Staite; Afrisa Yeung; Digby Elliott; James L Lyons
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Mechanisms of responsibility assignment during redundant reaching movements.

Authors:  Alexandra Reichenbach; Angela Costello; Peter Zatka-Haas; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.