| Literature DB >> 11176769 |
K M Coppola1, P H Ditto, J H Danks, W D Smucker.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Past research has documented that primary care physicians and family members are often inaccurate when making substituted judgments for patients without advance directives (ADs). This study compared the accuracy of substituted judgments made by primary care physicians, hospital-based physicians, and family surrogates on behalf of elderly outpatients and examined the effectiveness of ADs in improving the accuracy of these judgments. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Participants were 24 primary care physicians of 82 elderly outpatients, 17 emergency and critical care physicians who had no prior experience with the patients, and a baseline comparison group of family surrogates. The primary outcome was accuracy of physicians' predictions of patients' preferences for 4 life-sustaining treatments in 9 hypothetical illness scenarios. Physicians made substituted judgments after being provided with no patient AD, patient's value-based AD, or patient's scenario-based AD.Entities:
Keywords: Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship
Mesh:
Year: 2001 PMID: 11176769 DOI: 10.1001/archinte.161.3.431
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Intern Med ISSN: 0003-9926