Literature DB >> 11176769

Accuracy of primary care and hospital-based physicians' predictions of elderly outpatients' treatment preferences with and without advance directives.

K M Coppola1, P H Ditto, J H Danks, W D Smucker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Past research has documented that primary care physicians and family members are often inaccurate when making substituted judgments for patients without advance directives (ADs). This study compared the accuracy of substituted judgments made by primary care physicians, hospital-based physicians, and family surrogates on behalf of elderly outpatients and examined the effectiveness of ADs in improving the accuracy of these judgments. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Participants were 24 primary care physicians of 82 elderly outpatients, 17 emergency and critical care physicians who had no prior experience with the patients, and a baseline comparison group of family surrogates. The primary outcome was accuracy of physicians' predictions of patients' preferences for 4 life-sustaining treatments in 9 hypothetical illness scenarios. Physicians made substituted judgments after being provided with no patient AD, patient's value-based AD, or patient's scenario-based AD.
RESULTS: Family surrogates' judgments were more accurate than physicians'. Hospital-based physicians making predictions without ADs had the lowest accuracy. Primary care physicians' accuracy was not improved by either AD. Accuracy and confidence in predictions of hospital-based physicians was significantly improved for some scenarios using a scenario-based AD.
CONCLUSIONS: Although ADs do not improve the accuracy of substituted judgments for primary care physicians or family surrogates, they increase the accuracy of hospital-based physicians. Primary care physicians are withdrawing from hospital-based care in growing numbers, and emergency medicine and critical care specialists most often are involved in decisions about whether to begin life-sustaining treatments. If ADs can help these physicians better understand patients' preferences, patient autonomy more likely will be preserved when patients become incapacitated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11176769     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.161.3.431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  40 in total

1.  Accuracy of a decision aid for advance care planning: simulated end-of-life decision making.

Authors:  Benjamin H Levi; Steven R Heverley; Michael J Green
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  2011

2.  End-of-life decision-making confidence in surrogates of African-American dialysis patients is overly optimistic.

Authors:  Mi-Kyung Song; Sandra E Ward; Feng-Chang Lin
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  Too soon to give up: re-examining the value of advance directives.

Authors:  Benjamin H Levi; Michael J Green
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 11.229

Review 4.  The evolution of health care advance planning law and policy.

Authors:  Charles P Sabatino
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  Advance care planning for patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Benjamin H Levi; Zachary Simmons; Courtney Hanna; Allyson Brothers; Erik Lehman; Elana Farace; Megan Bain; Renee Stewart; Michael J Green
Journal:  Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener       Date:  2017-03-05       Impact factor: 4.092

Review 6.  Engaging Patients With Advance Directives Using an Information Visualization Approach.

Authors:  Janet Woollen; Suzanne Bakken
Journal:  J Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 1.254

7.  [Validation of an advance directive].

Authors:  H Rüddel; M Zenz
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-12-25       Impact factor: 1.041

8.  Family understanding of seriously-ill patient preferences for family involvement in healthcare decision making.

Authors:  Rashmi K Sharma; Mark T Hughes; Marie T Nolan; Carrie Tudor; Joan Kub; Peter B Terry; Daniel P Sulmasy
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Substituted judgment: the limitations of autonomy in surrogate decision making.

Authors:  Alexia M Torke; G Caleb Alexander; John Lantos
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  National questionnaire survey on what influences doctors' decisions about admission to intensive care.

Authors:  Monica Escher; Thomas V Perneger; Jean-Claude Chevrolet
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-08-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.