Monica Escher1, Thomas V Perneger, Jean-Claude Chevrolet. 1. Pain and Palliative Care Consultation, Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Geneva University Hospitals, CH-1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland. monica.escher@hcuge.ch
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine what influences doctors' decisions about admission of patients to intensive care. DESIGN: National questionnaire survey using eight clinical vignettes involving hypothetical patients. SETTING: Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS: 402 Swiss doctors specialising in intensive care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rating of factors influencing decisions on admission and response to eight hypothetical clinical scenarios. RESULTS: Of 381 doctors agreeing to participate, 232 (61%) returned questionnaires. Most rated as important or very important the prognosis of the underlying disease (82%) and of the acute illness (81%) and the patients' wishes (71%). Few considered important the socioeconomic circumstances of the patient (2%), religious beliefs (3%), and emotional state (6%). In the vignettes, underlying disease (cancer versus non-cancerous disease) was not associated with admission to intensive care, but four other factors were: patients' wishes (odds ratio 3.0, 95% confidence interval 2.0 to 4.6), "upbeat" personality (2.9, 1.9 to 4.4), younger age (1.5, 1.1 to 2.2), and a greater number of beds available in intensive care (1.8, 1.2 to 2.5). CONCLUSIONS: Doctors' decisions to admit patients to intensive care are influenced by patients' wishes and ethically problematic non-medical factors such as a patient's personality or availability of beds. Patients with cancer are not discriminated against.
OBJECTIVE: To determine what influences doctors' decisions about admission of patients to intensive care. DESIGN: National questionnaire survey using eight clinical vignettes involving hypothetical patients. SETTING: Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS: 402 Swiss doctors specialising in intensive care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rating of factors influencing decisions on admission and response to eight hypothetical clinical scenarios. RESULTS: Of 381 doctors agreeing to participate, 232 (61%) returned questionnaires. Most rated as important or very important the prognosis of the underlying disease (82%) and of the acute illness (81%) and the patients' wishes (71%). Few considered important the socioeconomic circumstances of the patient (2%), religious beliefs (3%), and emotional state (6%). In the vignettes, underlying disease (cancer versus non-cancerous disease) was not associated with admission to intensive care, but four other factors were: patients' wishes (odds ratio 3.0, 95% confidence interval 2.0 to 4.6), "upbeat" personality (2.9, 1.9 to 4.4), younger age (1.5, 1.1 to 2.2), and a greater number of beds available in intensive care (1.8, 1.2 to 2.5). CONCLUSIONS: Doctors' decisions to admit patients to intensive care are influenced by patients' wishes and ethically problematic non-medical factors such as a patient's personality or availability of beds. Patients with cancer are not discriminated against.
Entities:
Keywords:
Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship
Authors: Thomas S Valley; Michael W Sjoding; Andrew M Ryan; Theodore J Iwashyna; Colin R Cooke Journal: JAMA Date: 2015 Sep 22-29 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Daniel K Nishijima; Jason S Haukoos; Craig D Newgard; Kristan Staudenmayer; Nathan White; David Slattery; Preston C Maxim; Christopher A Gee; Renee Y Hsia; Joy A Melnikow; James F Holmes Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2012-09-27 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Colin R Cooke; Laura C Feemster; Renda Soylemez Wiener; Maya E O'Neil; Christopher G Slatore Journal: Chest Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Elie Azoulay; Peter Schellongowski; Michael Darmon; Philippe R Bauer; Dominique Benoit; Pieter Depuydt; Jigeeshu V Divatia; Virginie Lemiale; Maarten van Vliet; Anne-Pascale Meert; Djamel Mokart; Stephen M Pastores; Anders Perner; Frédéric Pène; Peter Pickkers; Kathryn A Puxty; Francois Vincent; Jorge Salluh; Ayman O Soubani; Massimo Antonelli; Thomas Staudinger; Michael von Bergwelt-Baildon; Marcio Soares Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2017-07-19 Impact factor: 17.440