Literature DB >> 11170325

Coronary angiography through the radial or the femoral approach: The CARAFE study.

Y Louvard1, T Lefèvre, A Allain, M Morice.   

Abstract

In a previous study, the radial approach for coronary angiography was shown to be associated with a lower success rate and longer procedural and X-ray times compared to the femoral approach. However, this approach is associated with a steep learning curve. A series of 210 consecutive nonselected patients were randomized to femoral versus right radial approach or femoral versus left radial approach by two experienced operators. Clinical characteristics were similar in the three groups. Technical failure occurred in one patient in the right radial group with subsequent crossover to left radial artery. The number of coronary catheters used was lower in the right radial group (1.4 +/- 0.7 vs. 2.1 +/- 0.4 for the two other groups). The procedural duration was longer with left radial (14.2 +/- 3.3 min; P < 0.05) approach than with right radial (12.4 +/- 5.8 min) and femoral (11.2 +/- 3.3 min) without significant differences between femoral and right radial. X-ray exposure was shorter in the femoral group (3.1 +/- 1.7 min) than in both radial groups (right: 3.8 +/- 2.2 min; left: 4.2 +/- 1.7 min). The angiographic quality was not different between the three groups for RCA, but was less good for LCA through right radial approach. Bed rest and hospital stay were shorter in the two radial groups. The comfort was judged better with the transradial approach. An ad hoc PTCA was performed in 45.7% of femoral patients, 41.4% of right radial, and 44.3% of left radial with immediate sheath withdrawal (closure device for femoral group). There were no severe complications in the three groups, but two patients from the femoral group were discharged later because of vascular complications. The total cost of coronary angiography was higher in the femoral group. In conclusion, after the learning period, transradial coronary angiography can be performed with a high success rate, low rate of complication, and good angiographic quality. It is associated with a slight increase in procedural (LR) and fluoroscopy times, but permits earlier ambulation and discharge, improves patient comfort, and reduces the cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11170325     DOI: 10.1002/1522-726x(200102)52:2<181::aid-ccd1044>3.0.co;2-g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  46 in total

1.  Transradial cerebral angiography: technique and outcomes.

Authors:  Alison M Nohara; David F Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Radial artery access for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  R Andrew Archbold; Nicholas M Robinson; Richard J Schilling
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-08-21

Review 3.  Radial versus femoral access for percutaneous coronary intervention: implications for vascular complications and bleeding.

Authors:  Sandeep Nathan; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  The comparative efficacy of bivalirudin is markedly attenuated by use of radial access: insights from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium.

Authors:  Emily Perdoncin; Milan Seth; Simon Dixon; Louis Cannon; Akshay Khandelwal; Arthur Riba; Shukri David; David Wohns; Hitinder Gurm
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Evaluation of Previously Cannulated Radial Arteries as Patent Coronary Artery Bypass Conduits.

Authors:  Timothy Watson; Adele Pope; Niels van Pelt; Peter N Ruygrok
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2015-10-01

6.  Radial versus femoral artery access for percutaneous coronary angiography and intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in Chinese population.

Authors:  Peng Liu; Xue Liang Gao; Bei Fang Li; Xue Zhi Ding; Zi Hao Wang; Yan Ping Dang; Yang Gui Liu; Yun Fu Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15

7.  Novel diagnostic catheter specifically designed for both coronary arteries via the right transradial approach. A prospective, randomized trial of Tiger II vs. Judkins catheters.

Authors:  Seong-Man Kim; Dae-Kyeong Kim; Doo-Il Kim; Dong-Soo Kim; Seung-Jae Joo; Jae-Woo Lee
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Percutaneous coronary intervention: recommendations for good practice and training.

Authors:  K D Dawkins; T Gershlick; M de Belder; A Chauhan; G Venn; P Schofield; D Smith; J Watkins; H H Gray
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Transradial versus Transfemoral Approach in Peripheral Arterial Interventions.

Authors:  Ohad Oren; Michal Oren; Yoav Turgeman
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2015-09-07

10.  TransRadial Education and Therapeutics (TREAT): shifting the balance of safety and efficacy of antithrombotic agents in percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the Cardiac Safety Research Consortium.

Authors:  Connie N Hess; Sunil V Rao; David F Kong; Julie M Miller; Kevin J Anstrom; Olivier F Bertrand; Jean-Philippe Collet; Mark B Effron; Benjamin C Eloff; Emmanuel O Fadiran; Andrew Farb; Ian C Gilchrist; David R Holmes; Alice K Jacobs; Prashant Kaul; L Kristin Newby; David R Rutledge; Dale R Tavris; Thomas T Tsai; Roseann M White; Eric D Peterson; Mitchell W Krucoff
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.749

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.