Literature DB >> 11168257

Basic surgical principles with ITI implants.

D Buser1, T von Arx, C ten Bruggenkate, D Weingart.   

Abstract

The basic surgical principles governing the placement of ITI implants are based on research-oriented developments in harmony with evidence-based and outcome-oriented clinical procedures. In the past 15 years, the range of implant indications has been significantly widened, and partially edentulous patients clearly represent the majority of patients seeking treatment with dental implants today. An important aspect of the successful rehabilitation of patients with ITI implants is the careful selection of implant candidates with respect to systemic and local risk factors. These factors are presented based on current knowledge. Today, solid-screw implants in various screw dimensions and neck configurations comprise the ITI Dental Implant System. These different implant types are necessary to handle the full range of implant indications, in particular in partially edentulous patients. The main clinical factors are presented for the selection of the appropriate implant type, length and diameter. These implants are utilized both in a non-submerged and in a submerged approach. The main goal of surgical therapy is low trauma and the least demanding surgical procedure for patient and clinician to optimize the cost-effectiveness of implant therapy. Hence, a non-submerged approach is preferred in all sites without esthetic priority, such as in fully edentulous patients or in posterior sites of partially edentulous patients. These indications clearly represent the majority of implant patients. In esthetic sites, a submerged approach is utilized to satisfy the specific esthetic demands. The possibility to successfully utilize short implants (6 and 8 mm) and a reduced healing period of 3 months are further advantages of ITI implants due to favorable properties of the rough TPS surface. With the introduction of the microrough SLA surface, a reduction of the healing period to 6 weeks facilitates further progress towards simplification of implant therapy. In summary, the ITI Dental Implant System represents a scientifically well-documented, complete implant system for the treatment of fully and partially edentulous patients, offering straightforward surgical concepts based on predictable treatment outcome and excellent cost-effectiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11168257     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011s1059.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  17 in total

1.  Effect of targeted delivery of bone morphogenetic protein-2 on bone formation in type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Ronaldo Barcellos de Santana; Phillip C Trackman
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 2.  Alveolar ridge preservation. A systematic review.

Authors:  Attila Horváth; Nikos Mardas; Luis André Mezzomo; Ian G Needleman; Nikos Donos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Differentiating success from survival in modern implantology--key considerations for case selection, predicting complications and obtaining consent.

Authors:  J Beaumont; G McManus; J Darcey
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Ridge alterations post-extraction in the esthetic zone: a 3D analysis with CBCT.

Authors:  V Chappuis; O Engel; M Reyes; K Shahim; L-P Nolte; D Buser
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 6.116

5.  Success and patient satisfaction of immediately loaded zirconia implants with fixed restorations one year after loading.

Authors:  Rico Rutkowski; Ralf Smeets; Leon Neuhöffer; Carolin Stolzer; Kilian Strick; Martin Gosau; Susanne Sehner; Karl Ulrich Volz; Anders Henningsen
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 3.747

6.  Alveolar bone regeneration for immediate implant placement using an injectable bone substitute: an experimental study in dogs.

Authors:  Damien Boix; Olivier Gauthier; Jérôme Guicheux; Paul Pilet; Pierre Weiss; Gaël Grimandi; Guy Daculsi
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.993

7.  Complication incidence of two implant systems up to six years: a comparison between internal and external connection implants.

Authors:  Sung-Wook Chae; Young-Sung Kim; Yong-Moo Lee; Won-Kyung Kim; Young-Kyoo Lee; Su-Hwan Kim
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.614

Review 8.  Does HIV infection have an impact upon dental implant osseointegration? A systematic review.

Authors:  Javier Ata-Ali; Fadi Ata-Ali; Nicolas Di-Benedetto; Leticia Bagán; José-Vicente Bagán
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2015-05-01

9.  A simplified method of preventing implant hex drive from aspiration or accidental swallowing during stage two implant recovery.

Authors:  Akurati Ratnaditya; Srinivas Ravuri; Durga Prasad Tadi; Chaitanya Ram Kandregula; Rajkumar Chowdary Kopuri; Venkata Girish Pentakota
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2014-11

10.  Smoking, radiotherapy, diabetes and osteoporosis as risk factors for dental implant failure: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hui Chen; Nizhou Liu; Xinchen Xu; Xinhua Qu; Eryi Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.