Literature DB >> 26768466

Differentiating success from survival in modern implantology--key considerations for case selection, predicting complications and obtaining consent.

J Beaumont, G McManus, J Darcey1.   

Abstract

The use of dental implants to restore edentulous areas has increased significantly since the 1970s and is now considered, by many, the gold standard restorative treatment. As such it has become increasingly important to understand what constitutes success for these rehabilitations. Increasing focus has been given to acknowledging the difference between success and survival: the two being potentially very different outcomes for such invasive and expensive treatment. This article aims to describe this distinction and ultimately the implications of this for both patient and clinician.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26768466     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.26

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN: 0007-0610            Impact factor:   1.626


  53 in total

1.  Measuring the effect of intra-oral implant rehabilitation on health-related quality of life in a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  M A Awad; D Locker; N Korner-Bitensky; J S Feine
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 2.  The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients.

Authors:  J S Feine; G E Carlsson; M A Awad; A Chehade; W J Duncan; S Gizani; T Head; G Heydecke; J P Lund; M MacEntee; R Mericske-Stern; P Mojon; J A Morais; I Naert; A G T Payne; J Penrod; G T Stoker; A Tawse-Smith; T D Taylor; J M Thomason; W M Thomson; D Wismeijer
Journal:  Gerodontology       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 3.  Success or failure of dental implants? A literature review with treatment considerations.

Authors:  Judith A Porter; J Anthony von Fraunhofer
Journal:  Gen Dent       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec

4.  Surgical guidelines for dental implant placement.

Authors:  M Handelsman
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2006-08-12       Impact factor: 1.626

5.  Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies.

Authors:  P I Brånemark; R Adell; U Breine; B O Hansson; J Lindström; A Ohlsson
Journal:  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1969

Review 6.  The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success.

Authors:  T Albrektsson; G Zarb; P Worthington; A R Eriksson
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 7.  A comprehensive and critical review of dental implant placement in diabetic animals and patients.

Authors:  Sotirios Kotsovilis; Ioannis K Karoussis; Ioannis Fourmousis
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 8.  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: management of soft tissues for dental implants.

Authors:  Marco Esposito; Hassan Maghaireh; Maria Gabriella Grusovin; Ioannis Ziounas; Helen V Worthington
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-02-15

Review 9.  Patient screening and medical evaluation for implant and preprosthetic surgery.

Authors:  M Chanavaz
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 10.  Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs).

Authors:  Bjarni E Pjetursson; Urs Brägger; Niklaus P Lang; Marcel Zwahlen
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.977

View more
  1 in total

1.  Unilateral removable partial dentures.

Authors:  W A Goodall; A C Greer; N Martin
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 1.626

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.