Literature DB >> 11164875

Do neck-proprioceptive and caloric-vestibular stimulation influence covert visual attention in normals, as they influence visual neglect?

C Rorden1, H O Karnath, J Driver.   

Abstract

Neck-proprioceptive and caloric-vestibular stimulation have been shown to ameliorate the spatial bias exhibited by patients suffering from unilateral visual neglect. These interventions might in principle have their effect by biasing covert attention towards the neglected side. If so, the same interventions should also modulate covert attention in neurologically-intact subjects. However, we demonstrate here that neither neck-proprioception (vibration of left neck muscles) nor caloric-vestibular stimulation (injection of iced water into the left ear) affect covert visual attention in healthy individuals. These results from normals may distinguish between different accounts for unilateral neglect in patients. In particular, they argue against explanations of neglect solely in terms of a pathological misperception of body orientation within an otherwise normal neural representation of space.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11164875     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(00)00126-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  13 in total

1.  Strength in numbers: combining neck vibration and prism adaptation produces additive therapeutic effects in unilateral neglect.

Authors:  Styrmir Saevarsson; Arni Kristjansson; Ulrike Halsband
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.868

2.  How the vestibular system modulates tactile perception in normal subjects: a behavioural and physiological study.

Authors:  Elisa Raffaella Ferrè; Anna Sedda; Martina Gandola; Gabriella Bottini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Discrimination between active and passive head movements by macaque ventral and medial intraparietal cortex neurons.

Authors:  François Klam; Werner Graf
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Vestibular-somatosensory interactions affect the perceived timing of tactile stimuli.

Authors:  Stefania S Moro; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Decreased visual attention further from the perceived direction of gaze for equidistant retinal targets.

Authors:  Daniela Balslev; Emma Gowen; R Chris Miall
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Do head-on-trunk signals modulate disengagement of spatial attention?

Authors:  Jiaqing Chen; Matthias Niemeier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Are object- and space-based attentional biases both important to free-viewing perceptual asymmetries?

Authors:  Michael E R Nicholls; Georgina Hughes; Jason B Mattingley; John L Bradshaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Galvanic vestibular stimulation influences randomness of number generation.

Authors:  Elisa Raffaella Ferrè; Eleonora Vagnoni; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The vestibular system modulates the contributions of head and torso to egocentric spatial judgements.

Authors:  Elisa R Ferrè; Adrian J T Alsmith; Patrick Haggard; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Vestibular modulation of spatial perception.

Authors:  Elisa R Ferrè; Matthew R Longo; Federico Fiori; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.