Literature DB >> 11164373

Effects of low atmospheric CO(2) on plants: more than a thing of the past.

R F Sage1, J R Coleman.   

Abstract

In recent geological time, atmospheric CO(2) concentrations were 25-50% below the current level. Photosynthetic productivity of C(3) plants is substantially reduced at these low CO(2) levels, particularly at higher temperatures and during stress. Acclimation of photosynthesis to reduced CO(2) levels might compensate for some of this inhibition, but plants have a limited capacity to modulate Rubisco and other photosynthetic proteins following CO(2) reduction. Because of this, low CO(2) probably acted as a significant evolutionary agent, selecting plants adapted to CO(2) deficiency. Adaptations to low CO(2) might still exist in plants and might constrain responses to a rising CO(2) concentration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11164373     DOI: 10.1016/s1360-1385(00)01813-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Plant Sci        ISSN: 1360-1385            Impact factor:   18.313


  34 in total

Review 1.  Some aspects of ecophysiological and biogeochemical responses of tropical forests to atmospheric change.

Authors:  Jeffrey Q Chambers; Whendee L Silver
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Quo vadis C(4)? An ecophysiological perspective on global change and the future of C(4) plants.

Authors:  Rowan F Sage; David S Kubien
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Land plants equilibrate O2 and CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere.

Authors:  Abir U Igamberdiev; Peter J Lea
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Plant light interception can be explained via computed tomography scanning: demonstration with pyramidal cedar (Thuja occidentalis, Fastigiata).

Authors:  Pierre Dutilleul; Liwen Han; Donald L Smith
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 5.  Food security and climate change: on the potential to adapt global crop production by active selection to rising atmospheric carbon dioxide.

Authors:  Lewis H Ziska; James A Bunce; Hiroyuki Shimono; David R Gealy; Jeffrey T Baker; Paul C D Newton; Matthew P Reynolds; Krishna S V Jagadish; Chunwu Zhu; Mark Howden; Lloyd T Wilson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Temperature responses of the Rubisco maximum carboxylase activity across domains of life: phylogenetic signals, trade-offs, and importance for carbon gain.

Authors:  J Galmés; M V Kapralov; L O Copolovici; C Hermida-Carrera; Ü Niinemets
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 7.  Extreme events as shaping physiology, ecology, and evolution of plants: toward a unified definition and evaluation of their consequences.

Authors:  Vincent P Gutschick; Hormoz BassiriRad
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 10.151

8.  Isolation and Expression Analysis of Three Types of α-Carbonic Anhydrases from the Antarctic Alga Chlamydomonas sp. ICE-L under Different Light Stress Treatments.

Authors:  Chongli Shi; Meiling An; Jinlai Miao; Yingying He; Zhou Zheng; Changfeng Qu; Xixi Wang; Huan Lin; Junhong Liu
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.695

9.  Host Plant Physiology and Mycorrhizal Functioning Shift across a Glacial through Future [CO2] Gradient.

Authors:  Katie M Becklin; George W R Mullinix; Joy K Ward
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Genotypes of Brassica rapa respond differently to plant-induced variation in air CO2 concentration in growth chambers with standard and enhanced venting.

Authors:  Christine E Edwards; Monia S H Haselhorst; Autumn M McKnite; Brent E Ewers; David G Williams; Cynthia Weinig
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 5.699

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.