Literature DB >> 19603146

Genotypes of Brassica rapa respond differently to plant-induced variation in air CO2 concentration in growth chambers with standard and enhanced venting.

Christine E Edwards1, Monia S H Haselhorst, Autumn M McKnite, Brent E Ewers, David G Williams, Cynthia Weinig.   

Abstract

Growth chambers allow measurement of phenotypic differences among genotypes under controlled environment conditions. However, unintended variation in growth chamber air CO2 concentration ([CO2]) may affect the expression of diverse phenotypic traits, and genotypes may differ in their response to variation in [CO2]. We monitored [CO2] and quantified phenotypic responses of 22 Brassica rapa genotypes in growth chambers with either standard or enhanced venting. [CO2] in chambers with standard venting dropped to 280 micromol mol(-1) during the period of maximum canopy development, approximately 80 micromol mol(-1) lower than in chambers with enhanced venting. The stable carbon isotope ratio of CO2 in chamber air (delta13C(air)) was negatively correlated with [CO2], suggesting that photosynthesis caused observed [CO2] decreases. Significant genotype x chamber-venting interactions were detected for 12 of 20 traits, likely due to differences in the extent to which [CO2] changed in relation to genotypes' phenology or differential sensitivity of genotypes to low [CO2]. One trait, 13C discrimination (delta13C), was particularly influenced by unaccounted-for fluctuations in delta13C(air) and [CO2]. Observed responses to [CO2] suggest that genetic variance components estimated in poorly vented growth chambers may be influenced by the expression of genes involved in CO2 stress responses; genotypic values estimated in these chambers may likewise be misleading such that some mapped quantitative trait loci may regulate responses to CO2 stress rather than a response to the environmental factor of interest. These results underscore the importance of monitoring, and where possible, controlling [CO2].

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19603146     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-009-1103-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  25 in total

1.  Gas-exchange measurements using a large, closed plant growth chamber.

Authors:  R M Wheeler
Journal:  HortScience       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 1.455

2.  Quantitative trait loci affecting delta13C and response to differential water availibility in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Neil J Hausmann; Thomas E Juenger; Sáunak Sen; Kirk A Stowe; Todd E Dawson; Ellen L Simms
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Are source and sink strengths genetically linked in maize plants subjected to water deficit? A QTL study of the responses of leaf growth and of Anthesis-Silking Interval to water deficit.

Authors:  C Welcker; B Boussuge; C Bencivenni; J-M Ribaut; F Tardieu
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 6.992

4.  The carbon isotope ratio of plant organic material reflects temporal and spatial variations in CO2 within tropical forest formations in Trinidad.

Authors:  M S J Broadmeadow; H Griffiths; C Maxwell; A M Borland
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Variation in leaf carbon isotope discrimination in Encelia farinosa: implications for growth, competition, and drought survival.

Authors:  James R Ehleringer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Effects of low and elevated CO2 on C3 and C4 annuals : I. Growth and biomass allocation.

Authors:  J K Dippery; D T Tissue; R B Thomas; B R Strain
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Leaf δ13C in Pinus resinosa trees and understory plants: variation associated with light and CO2 gradients.

Authors:  Stephanie C Berry; Gregory T Varney; L B Flanagan
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Effects of low and elevated CO2 on C3 and C4 annuals : II. Photosynthesis and leaf biochemistry.

Authors:  D T Tissue; K L Griffin; R B Thomas; B R Strain
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Identification of causal relationships among traits related to drought resistance in Stylosanthes scabra using QTL analysis.

Authors:  B R Thumma; B P Naidu; A Chandra; D F Cameron; L M Bahnisch; C Liu
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.992

10.  PARENTAL EFFECTS IN PLANTAGO LANCEOLATA L. I.: A GROWTH CHAMBER EXPERIMENT TO EXAMINE PRE- AND POSTZYGOTIC TEMPERATURE EFFECTS.

Authors:  Elizabeth P Lacey
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  5 in total

1.  The genetic architecture of ecophysiological and circadian traits in Brassica rapa.

Authors:  Christine E Edwards; Brent E Ewers; David G Williams; Qiguang Xie; Ping Lou; Xiaodong Xu; C Robertson McClung; Cynthia Weinig
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The quantitative-genetic and QTL architecture of trait integration and modularity in Brassica rapa across simulated seasonal settings.

Authors:  C E Edwards; C Weinig
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Allocation to male vs female floral function varies by currency and responds differentially to density and moisture stress.

Authors:  M T Brock; R L Winkelman; M J Rubin; C E Edwards; B E Ewers; C Weinig
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Polymorphism identification and improved genome annotation of Brassica rapa through Deep RNA sequencing.

Authors:  Upendra Kumar Devisetty; Michael F Covington; An V Tat; Saradadevi Lekkala; Julin N Maloof
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.154

5.  Genotypic variation in biomass allocation in response to field drought has a greater affect on yield than gas exchange or phenology.

Authors:  Christine E Edwards; Brent E Ewers; Cynthia Weinig
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 4.215

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.