Literature DB >> 16308691

Planning and drawing complex shapes.

Martha Flanders1, Leigh A Mrotek, C C A M Gielen.   

Abstract

Arm and hand movements are generally controlled using a combination of sensory-based and memory-based guidance mechanisms. This study examined similarities and differences in visually-guided and memory-guided arm movements, and sought to determine as to what extent certain control principles apply to each type of movement. In particular, the 2/3 power law is a principle that appears to govern the formation of complex, curved hand trajectories; it specifies that the tangential velocity should be proportional to the radius of curvature raised to an exponent of 1/3. A virtual reality system was used to project complex target paths in three-dimensional (3D) space. Human subjects first tracked (with the tip of a handheld pen) a single target moving along an unseen path. The entire target path then became visible and the subject traced the shape. Finally, the target shape disappeared and the subject was to draw it, in the same 3D space, from memory. Most aspects of the movements (speed, path size, shape and arm postures) were very similar across the three conditions. However, subjects adhered to the 2/3 power law most closely in the tracing condition, when the entire target path was visible. Also, only within the tracing condition, there were significant differences in the value of the exponent depending on the size and the spatial orientation of the trajectory. In the tracking and drawing conditions, the exponent was greater than 1/3, indicating that subjects spent more time in areas of tight curvature. This may represent a strategy for learning and remembering the complex shape.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16308691     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0252-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  21 in total

1.  Origins and violations of the 2/3 power law in rhythmic three-dimensional arm movements.

Authors:  S Schaal; D Sternad
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The Duncker illusion and eye-hand coordination.

Authors:  J F Soechting; K C Engel; M Flanders
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Action plans used in action observation.

Authors:  J Randall Flanagan; Roland S Johansson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-08-14       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Transformation from head- to shoulder-centered representation of target direction in arm movements.

Authors:  J F Soechting; S I Tillery; M Flanders
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Smoothness maximization along a predefined path accurately predicts the speed profiles of complex arm movements.

Authors:  E Todorov; M I Jordan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  An algorithm for the generation of curvilinear wrist motion in an arbitrary plane in three-dimensional space.

Authors:  J F Soechting; C A Terzuolo
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Relation between velocity and curvature in movement: equivalence and divergence between a power law and a minimum-jerk model.

Authors:  J Wann; I Nimmo-Smith; A M Wing
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Moving effortlessly in three dimensions: does Donders' law apply to arm movement?

Authors:  J F Soechting; C A Buneo; U Herrmann; M Flanders
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Comparing smooth arm movements with the two-thirds power law and the related segmented-control hypothesis.

Authors:  Magnus J E Richardson; Tamar Flash
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  3 in total

1.  The speed-curvature power law of movements: a reappraisal.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Adam Matic; Tamar Flash; Alex Gomez-Marin; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Movement timing and invariance arise from several geometries.

Authors:  Daniel Bennequin; Ronit Fuchs; Alain Berthoz; Tamar Flash
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  Differentiation between external and internal cuing: an fMRI study comparing tracing with drawing.

Authors:  E Gowen; R C Miall
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 6.556

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.