AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of impression cytology employing a Biopore membrane device in the diagnosis of ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN). METHODS: The histology of patients undergoing excision biopsy for the suspected diagnosis of OSSN over a 20 month period was compared with the reported cytology of impression cytology specimens obtained preoperatively using the Biopore membrane device. RESULTS: 25 excision biopsies were performed for suspected OSSN. There was accurate correlation in 20 out of the 25 cases (80%). In three cases (12%), there was poor correlation in that only a few dysplastic cells and hyperkeratosis were noted on cytology, whereas histology showed keratinising dysplasia in two cases and a moderately differentiated keratinising squamous cell carcinoma in the third. There were two cases (8%) of non-correlation--one keratinising dysplasia on histology, but anucleate keratin, squamous metaplasia, and rare atypical cells on cytology, and another case with very mild focal dysplasia on histology but squamous metaplasia on cytology. Review of the cytology showed that dysplastic cells were either rare or absent from the cytology specimens in these two cases; it was felt that these represented sampling problems rather than true false negatives. There were no false positives on cytology. Final diagnosis on histology was squamous cell carcinoma in one; carcinoma in situ in two; keratinising dysplasia in 15, non-keratinising dysplasia in seven. CONCLUSION: Impression cytology employing the Biopore membrane accurately predicts the histological diagnosis of OSSN. The presence of hyperkeratosis, inflammatory cells with only a few dysplastic cells, may indicate high grade keratinising dysplasia or squamous cell carcinoma. The method is both rapid and easy to perform in routine clinical practice. These findings suggest that there may be a role for its use in the initial assessment and follow up of patients with suspected OSSN.
AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of impression cytology employing a Biopore membrane device in the diagnosis of ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN). METHODS: The histology of patients undergoing excision biopsy for the suspected diagnosis of OSSN over a 20 month period was compared with the reported cytology of impression cytology specimens obtained preoperatively using the Biopore membrane device. RESULTS: 25 excision biopsies were performed for suspected OSSN. There was accurate correlation in 20 out of the 25 cases (80%). In three cases (12%), there was poor correlation in that only a few dysplastic cells and hyperkeratosis were noted on cytology, whereas histology showed keratinising dysplasia in two cases and a moderately differentiated keratinising squamous cell carcinoma in the third. There were two cases (8%) of non-correlation--one keratinising dysplasia on histology, but anucleate keratin, squamous metaplasia, and rare atypical cells on cytology, and another case with very mild focal dysplasia on histology but squamous metaplasia on cytology. Review of the cytology showed that dysplastic cells were either rare or absent from the cytology specimens in these two cases; it was felt that these represented sampling problems rather than true false negatives. There were no false positives on cytology. Final diagnosis on histology was squamous cell carcinoma in one; carcinoma in situ in two; keratinising dysplasia in 15, non-keratinising dysplasia in seven. CONCLUSION: Impression cytology employing the Biopore membrane accurately predicts the histological diagnosis of OSSN. The presence of hyperkeratosis, inflammatory cells with only a few dysplastic cells, may indicate high grade keratinising dysplasia or squamous cell carcinoma. The method is both rapid and easy to perform in routine clinical practice. These findings suggest that there may be a role for its use in the initial assessment and follow up of patients with suspected OSSN.
Authors: J Frucht-Pery; J Sugar; J Baum; J E Sutphin; J Pe'er; H Savir; E J Holland; D M Meisler; J A Foster; R Folberg; Y Rozenman Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 1997-12 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Penelope A McKelvie; Mark Daniell; Alan McNab; Michael Loughnan; John D Santamaria Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Andrew N Siedlecki; Stephanie Tapp; Anna N A Tosteson; Robin J Larson; Carol L Karp; Thomas Lietman; Michael E Zegans Journal: Cornea Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Michael Yim; Anat Galor; Afshan Nanji; Madhura Joag; Sotiria Palioura; William Feuer; Carol L Karp Journal: Can J Ophthalmol Date: 2017-11-28 Impact factor: 1.882