PURPOSE: The basis of fluorescein-associated superficial punctate staining in dry eyes is controversial. Prior explanations include fluorescein pooling in surface erosive defects, intercellular trapping of fluorescein, and intracellular staining in dead cells. In this study, the hypothesis that punctate erosions are individual cells with enhanced fluorescence was tested. METHODS: Ten impression cytology membrane materials were compared, to optimize cellular yield in buccal mucosa and cornea. Clinicocytologic correlation of punctate fluorescent spots was performed in four dry eye patients. Individual punctate spots were localized by fiducial marks in photographs, before and after removal with impression membranes, and were traced in fluorescence microscopy and cytologic staining. Two-way contingency table analysis was used to determine the correlation of punctate spots with cells removed by the membrane. Clinicopathologic correlation of punctate spots was performed in 10 corneas removed in dry eye patients by transplantation for concurrent diseases. Punctate fluorescence was tracked in specimens by fiducial marks and epifluorescence. The distribution of fluorescent spots in specific cell layers of the cornea was determined by confocal microscopy. RESULTS: Cellular yield was greatest with impressions from polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE [Teflon]; BioPore; Millipore, Billerica, MA) membrane compared with its closest rival (P = 0.019). Punctate fluorescent spots, most of which disappeared after impression cytology (71%), correlated with cells on the membranes (P = 0.009). The punctate spots were more frequent in the superficial cell layers of the cornea (80%) compared with the deepest two layers (0%) (P < 0.00049). CONCLUSIONS: Punctate epithelial erosions correspond to enhanced fluorescence in epithelial cells predominantly in superficial layers of the cornea and would be more aptly named fluorescent epithelial cells (FLECs).
PURPOSE: The basis of fluorescein-associated superficial punctate staining in dry eyes is controversial. Prior explanations include fluorescein pooling in surface erosive defects, intercellular trapping of fluorescein, and intracellular staining in dead cells. In this study, the hypothesis that punctate erosions are individual cells with enhanced fluorescence was tested. METHODS: Ten impression cytology membrane materials were compared, to optimize cellular yield in buccal mucosa and cornea. Clinicocytologic correlation of punctate fluorescent spots was performed in four dry eyepatients. Individual punctate spots were localized by fiducial marks in photographs, before and after removal with impression membranes, and were traced in fluorescence microscopy and cytologic staining. Two-way contingency table analysis was used to determine the correlation of punctate spots with cells removed by the membrane. Clinicopathologic correlation of punctate spots was performed in 10 corneas removed in dry eyepatients by transplantation for concurrent diseases. Punctate fluorescence was tracked in specimens by fiducial marks and epifluorescence. The distribution of fluorescent spots in specific cell layers of the cornea was determined by confocal microscopy. RESULTS: Cellular yield was greatest with impressions from polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE [Teflon]; BioPore; Millipore, Billerica, MA) membrane compared with its closest rival (P = 0.019). Punctate fluorescent spots, most of which disappeared after impression cytology (71%), correlated with cells on the membranes (P = 0.009). The punctate spots were more frequent in the superficial cell layers of the cornea (80%) compared with the deepest two layers (0%) (P < 0.00049). CONCLUSIONS: Punctate epithelial erosions correspond to enhanced fluorescence in epithelial cells predominantly in superficial layers of the cornea and would be more aptly named fluorescent epithelial cells (FLECs).
Authors: Ben J Glasgow; Oktay K Gasymov; Adil R Abduragimov; Jamison J Engle; Richard C Casey Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2009-12-03 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Jason J Nichols; P Ewen King-Smith; Erich A Hinel; Miru Thangavelu; Kelly K Nichols Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-08-20 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Alina Messner; Corinna Fischak; Martin Pfister; Kornelia Schützenberger; Fabian Garreis; Friedrich Paulsen; Hannes Stegmann; Valentin Aranha Dos Santos; Gerhard Garhöfer; Leopold Schmetterer; René M Werkmeister Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2019-08-28 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Srihari Narayanan; Rachel L Redfern; William L Miller; Kelly K Nichols; Alison M McDermott Journal: Ocul Surf Date: 2013-01-29 Impact factor: 5.033
Authors: K D Novakofski; R M Williams; L A Fortier; H O Mohammed; W R Zipfel; L J Bonassar Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2013-11-01 Impact factor: 6.576