Literature DB >> 23567204

HLA-DR expression as a biomarker of inflammation for multicenter clinical trials of ocular surface disease.

Seth P Epstein1, Neha Gadaria-Rathod, Yi Wei, Maureen G Maguire, Penny A Asbell.   

Abstract

There are currently no validated minimally invasive objective metrics for the classification and evaluation of ocular surface diseases and/or for evaluating treatment efficacy. We thus sought to establish a standardized methodology for determining the relative amount of the inflammatory biomarker HLA-DR on the ocular surface and to evaluate the precision, reliability and repeatability of its use for large multicenter clinical trials and translational research studies of ocular surface disease. Multiple studies were conducted to establish a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for utilizing HLA-DR expression as a minimally invasive, objective, ocular surface inflammatory biomarker. The established SOPs provide specific guidelines for HLA-DR collection and analysis, in order to incorporate it reliably into multicenter clinical trials and/or translational research. Duplicate cell samples from impression cytology (IC) samples of both normal and dry eye individuals were collected and split to assess repeatability (between the splits and between the duplicate samples). To determine storage capability, one duplicate was stained immediately and the other after 30 days cold storage. To demonstrate the feasibility of the use of the SOP for a multicenter clinical trial, clinicians out-of-state were trained to collect IC samples, and the samples shipped to our Biomarker Laboratory, logged, processed and analyzed. Demonstration of the ability to incorporate of IC into a randomized double masked clinical trial of dry eye disease (DED) was performed. In all cases, processing and analyses were performed by a masked independent observer. The validity/viability of the SOPs was established by demonstrating that: 1) sufficient numbers of cells can be collected via IC; 2) the precision/repeatability of the relative biomarker expression quantified in samples; 3) personnel at distant sites can be taught to collect, store and ship samples successfully; 4) samples can be stored for up to 30 days (refrigeration) before processing without affecting results; 5) IC can be incorporated into a double blind randomized clinical trial (RCT) of DED; and 6) the Biomarker Laboratory can track a large number of masked samples reliably. In conclusion, our standard operating procedure for impression cytology analysis of HLA-DR expression appears to be repeatable and reproducible for use in multicenter clinical trials, providing a minimally invasive objective biomarker of inflammation of the ocular surface.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23567204      PMCID: PMC4086244          DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2013.03.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Eye Res        ISSN: 0014-4835            Impact factor:   3.467


  50 in total

1.  Conjunctival brush cytology.

Authors:  K Tsubota; K Kajiwara; S Ugajin; T Hasegawa
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.319

2.  Impression cytology: a practical index of vitamin A status.

Authors:  G Natadisastra; J R Wittpenn; K P West; L Mele; A Sommer
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Application of impression cytology to the diagnosis of conjunctival neoplasms.

Authors:  G R Nolan; L W Hirst; R G Wright; B J Bancroft
Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.582

4.  T cell abnormalities in mixed connective tissue disease complicated with Klinefelter's syndrome.

Authors:  K Ishihara; M Yoshimura; H Nakao; Y Kanakura; Y Kanayama; Y Matsuzawa
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.271

5.  Correlation between tear IgE levels and HLA-DR expression by conjunctival cells in allergic and nonallergic chronic conjunctivitis.

Authors:  C Baudouin; T Bourcier; F Brignole; F Bertel; M Moldovan; M Goldschild; A Goguel
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Cytologic evidence of corneal diseases with limbal stem cell deficiency.

Authors:  V Puangsricharern; S C Tseng
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Impression cytology for detection of vitamin A deficiency.

Authors:  G Natadisastra; J R Wittpenn; K P West; A Sommer
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-09

8.  Immunopathological findings in conjunctival cells using immunofluorescence staining of impression cytology specimens.

Authors:  C Baudouin; N Haouat; F Brignole; J Bayle; P Gastaud
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Long-term immunomodulatory effects of T lymphocyte depletion in patients with systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  J J Goronzy; C M Weyand
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1990-04

10.  Activation antigens expressed on T-cells of the peripheral blood in Sjögren's syndrome and rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Y Ichikawa; H Shimizu; M Yoshida; S Arimori
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  1990 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.473

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  The core mechanism of dry eye disease is inflammation.

Authors:  Yi Wei; Penny A Asbell
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.018

2.  A Clinical Trial Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Tacrolimus versus Methylprednisolone in Ocular Graft-versus-Host Disease.

Authors:  Tulio B Abud; Francisco Amparo; Ujwala S Saboo; Antonio Di Zazzo; Thomas H Dohlman; Joseph B Ciolino; Pedram Hamrah; Reza Dana
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 3.  Update on the role of impression cytology in ocular surface disease.

Authors:  Zhang-Zhe Thia; Louis Tong
Journal:  Taiwan J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-09-12

Review 4.  Effects of Aging in Dry Eye.

Authors:  Cintia S de Paiva
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol Clin       Date:  2017

5.  Effects of Dry Eye Therapies on Environmentally Induced Ocular Surface Disease.

Authors:  Quianta L Moore; Cintia S De Paiva; Stephen C Pflugfelder
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Effect of trapping vascular endothelial growth factor-A in a murine model of dry eye with inflammatory neovascularization.

Authors:  Jin Woo Kwon; Jin A Choi; Eun Young Shin; Tae Yoon La; Dong Hyun Jee; Yeon Woong Chung; Yang Kyung Cho
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 7.  The role and treatment of inflammation in dry eye disease.

Authors:  Ayse Yagci; Canan Gurdal
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 8.  Sjögren syndrome: what and where are we looking for?

Authors:  Cintia S de Paiva; Eduardo Melani Rocha
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.761

Review 9.  The Pathophysiology of Dry Eye Disease: What We Know and Future Directions for Research.

Authors:  Stephen C Pflugfelder; Cintia S de Paiva
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 10.  Image-guided evaluation and monitoring of treatment response in patients with dry eye disease.

Authors:  Yureeda Qazi; Shruti Aggarwal; Pedram Hamrah
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.