Literature DB >> 14638945

Hox cluster duplications and the opportunity for evolutionary novelties.

Gunte P Wagner1, Chris Amemiya, Frank Ruddle.   

Abstract

Hox genes play a key role in animal body plan development. These genes tend to occur in tightly linked clusters in the genome. Vertebrates and invertebrates differ in their Hox cluster number, with vertebrates having multiple clusters and invertebrates usually having only one. Recent evidence shows that vertebrate Hox clusters are structurally more constrained than invertebrate Hox clusters; they exclude transposable elements, do not undergo tandem duplications, and conserve their intergenic distances and gene order. These constraints are only relaxed after a cluster duplication. In contrast, invertebrate Hox clusters are structurally more plastic; tandem duplications are common, the linkage of Hox genes can change quickly, or they can lose their structural integrity completely. We propose that the constraints on vertebrate Hox cluster structure lead to an association between the retention of duplicated Hox clusters and adaptive radiations. After a duplication the constraints on Hox cluster structure are temporarily lifted, which opens a window of evolvability for the Hox clusters. If this window of evolvability coincides with an adaptive radiation, chances are that a modified Hox cluster becomes recruited in an evolutionary novelty and then both copies of duplicated Hox clusters are retained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14638945      PMCID: PMC299744          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2536656100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  36 in total

1.  Maintenance of functional equivalence during paralogous Hox gene evolution.

Authors:  J M Greer; J Puetz; K R Thomas; M R Capecchi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-10       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The probability of duplicate gene preservation by subfunctionalization.

Authors:  M Lynch; A Force
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  A single Hox3 gene with composite bicoid and zerknullt expression characteristics in non-Cyclorrhaphan flies.

Authors:  Michael Stauber; Alexander Prell; Urs Schmidt-Ott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The ghost of selection past: rates of evolution and functional divergence of anciently duplicated genes.

Authors:  Y Van de Peer; J S Taylor; I Braasch; A Meyer
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2001 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Additional hox clusters in the zebrafish: divergent expression patterns belie equivalent activities of duplicate hoxB5 genes.

Authors:  A E Bruce; A C Oates; V E Prince; R K Ho
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.930

6.  How malleable is the eukaryotic genome? Extreme rate of chromosomal rearrangement in the genus Drosophila.

Authors:  J M Ranz; F Casals; A Ruiz
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  The amphioxus Hox cluster: deuterostome posterior flexibility and Hox14.

Authors:  D E Ferrier; C Minguillón; P W Holland; J Garcia-Fernàndez
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.930

8.  Characterization of the Hox cluster from the mosquito Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae).

Authors:  T P Powers; J Hogan; Z Ke; K Dymbrowski; X Wang; F H Collins; T C Kaufman
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.930

9.  Characterization of the Hox gene cluster in the malaria vector mosquito, Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  M P Devenport; C Blass; P Eggleston
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.930

10.  Evolution of Hoxa-11 in lineages phylogenetically positioned along the fin-limb transition.

Authors:  C H Chiu; D Nonaka; L Xue; C T Amemiya; G P Wagner
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.286

View more
  49 in total

1.  Surprising flexibility in a conserved Hox transcription factor over 550 million years of evolution.

Authors:  Alison Heffer; Jeffrey W Shultz; Leslie Pick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Concerted and birth-and-death evolution of multigene families.

Authors:  Masatoshi Nei; Alejandro P Rooney
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 16.830

3.  Selectionism and neutralism in molecular evolution.

Authors:  Masatoshi Nei
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2005-08-24       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Evolutionary change of the numbers of homeobox genes in bilateral animals.

Authors:  Jongmin Nam; Masatoshi Nei
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Molecular evolution of duplicated ray finned fish HoxA clusters: increased synonymous substitution rate and asymmetrical co-divergence of coding and non-coding sequences.

Authors:  Günter P Wagner; Kazuhiko Takahashi; Vincent Lynch; Sonja J Prohaska; Claudia Fried; Peter F Stadler; Chris Amemiya
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Ohno's dilemma: evolution of new genes under continuous selection.

Authors:  Ulfar Bergthorsson; Dan I Andersson; John R Roth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The Dlx gene complement of the leopard shark, Triakis semifasciata, resembles that of mammals: implications for genomic and morphological evolution of jawed vertebrates.

Authors:  David W Stock
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-10-16       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Evidence for at least six Hox clusters in the Japanese lamprey (Lethenteron japonicum).

Authors:  Tarang K Mehta; Vydianathan Ravi; Shinichi Yamasaki; Alison P Lee; Michelle M Lian; Boon-Hui Tay; Sumanty Tohari; Seiji Yanai; Alice Tay; Sydney Brenner; Byrappa Venkatesh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  A myelopoiesis-associated regulatory intergenic noncoding RNA transcript within the human HOXA cluster.

Authors:  Xueqing Zhang; Zheng Lian; Carolyn Padden; Mark B Gerstein; Joel Rozowsky; Michael Snyder; Thomas R Gingeras; Philipp Kapranov; Sherman M Weissman; Peter E Newburger
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  The duplication of the Hox gene clusters in teleost fishes.

Authors:  Sonja J Prohaska; Peter F Stadler
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.