Literature DB >> 10810084

Comparative genome mapping in the sequence-based era: early experience with human chromosome 7.

J W Thomas1, T J Summers, S Q Lee-Lin, V V Maduro, J R Idol, S D Mastrian, J F Ryan, D C Jamison, E D Green.   

Abstract

The success of the ongoing Human Genome Project has resulted in accelerated plans for completing the human genome sequence and the earlier-than-anticipated initiation of efforts to sequence the mouse genome. As a complement to these efforts, we are utilizing the available human sequence to refine human-mouse comparative maps and to assemble sequence-ready mouse physical maps. Here we describe how the first glimpses of genomic sequence from human chromosome 7 are directly facilitating these activities. Specifically, we are actively enhancing the available human-mouse comparative map by analyzing human chromosome 7 sequence for the presence of orthologs of mapped mouse genes. Such orthologs can then be precisely positioned relative to mapped human STSs and other genes. The chromosome 7 sequence generated to date has allowed us to more than double the number of genes that can be placed on the comparative map. The latter effort reveals that human chromosome 7 is represented by at least 20 orthologous segments of DNA in the mouse genome. A second component of our program involves systematically analyzing the evolving human chromosome 7 sequence for the presence of matching mouse genes and expressed-sequence tags (ESTs). Mouse-specific hybridization probes are designed from such sequences and used to screen a mouse bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) library, with the resulting data used to assemble BAC contigs based on probe-content data. Nascent contigs are then expanded using probes derived from newly generated BAC-end sequences. This approach produces BAC-based sequence-ready maps that are known to contain a gene(s) and are homologous to segments of the human genome for which sequence is already available. Our ongoing efforts have thus far resulted in the isolation and mapping of >3,800 mouse BACs, which have been assembled into >100 contigs. These contigs include >250 genes and represent approximately 40% of the mouse genome that is homologous to human chromosome 7. Together, these approaches illustrate how the availability of genomic sequence directly facilitates studies in comparative genomics and genome evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10810084      PMCID: PMC310865          DOI: 10.1101/gr.10.5.624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  32 in total

1.  WebBLAST 2.0: an integrated solution for organizing and analyzing sequence data.

Authors:  E S Ferlanti; J F Ryan; I Makalowska; A D Baxevanis
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  ComboScreen facilitates the multiplex hybridization-based screening of high-density clone arrays.

Authors:  D C Jamison; J W Thomas; E D Green
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Cloning and stable maintenance of 300-kilobase-pair fragments of human DNA in Escherichia coli using an F-factor-based vector.

Authors:  H Shizuya; B Birren; U J Kim; V Mancino; T Slepak; Y Tachiiri; M Simon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Toward a complete human genome sequence.

Authors: 
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 5.  Counting on comparative maps.

Authors:  J H Nadeau; D Sankoff
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 11.639

6.  An action plan for mouse genomics.

Authors:  J Battey; E Jordan; D Cox; W Dove
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  A common language for physical mapping of the human genome.

Authors:  M Olson; L Hood; C Cantor; D Botstein
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Lengths of chromosomal segments conserved since divergence of man and mouse.

Authors:  J H Nadeau; B A Taylor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  An encyclopedia of mouse genes.

Authors:  M Marra; L Hillier; T Kucaba; M Allen; R Barstead; C Beck; A Blistain; M Bonaldo; Y Bowers; L Bowles; M Cardenas; A Chamberlain; J Chappell; S Clifton; A Favello; S Geisel; M Gibbons; N Harvey; F Hill; Y Jackson; S Kohn; G Lennon; E Mardis; J Martin; L Mila; R McCann; R Morales; D Pape; B Person; C Prange; E Ritter; M Soares; R Schurk; T Shin; M Steptoe; T Swaller; B Theising; K Underwood; T Wylie; T Yount; R Wilson; R Waterston
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  New goals for the U.S. Human Genome Project: 1998-2003.

Authors:  F S Collins; A Patrinos; E Jordan; A Chakravarti; R Gesteland; L Walters
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-10-23       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  11 in total

1.  Generation and comparative analysis of approximately 3.3 Mb of mouse genomic sequence orthologous to the region of human chromosome 7q11.23 implicated in Williams syndrome.

Authors:  Udaya DeSilva; Laura Elnitski; Jacquelyn R Idol; Johannah L Doyle; Weiniu Gan; James W Thomas; Scott Schwartz; Nicole L Dietrich; Stephen M Beckstrom-Sternberg; Jennifer C McDowell; Robert W Blakesley; Gerard G Bouffard; Pamela J Thomas; Jeffrey W Touchman; Webb Miller; Eric D Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Comparative sequence analysis of a single-gene conserved segment in mouse and human.

Authors:  James W Thomas; Eric D Green
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.957

3.  Pericentromeric duplications in the laboratory mouse.

Authors:  James W Thomas; Mary G Schueler; Tyrone J Summers; Robert W Blakesley; Jennifer C McDowell; Pamela J Thomas; Jacquelyn R Idol; Valerie V B Maduro; Shih-Queen Lee-Lin; Jeffrey W Touchman; Gerard G Bouffard; Stephen M Beckstrom-Sternberg; Eric D Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 4.  Cross-species sequence comparisons: a review of methods and available resources.

Authors:  Kelly A Frazer; Laura Elnitski; Deanna M Church; Inna Dubchak; Ross C Hardison
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Estimation of DNA sequence context-dependent mutation rates using primate genomic sequences.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Gerard G Bouffard; Susan S Wallace; Jeffrey P Bond
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2007-08-04       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  How malleable is the eukaryotic genome? Extreme rate of chromosomal rearrangement in the genus Drosophila.

Authors:  J M Ranz; F Casals; A Ruiz
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Comparative analysis of the gene-dense ACHE/TFR2 region on human chromosome 7q22 with the orthologous region on mouse chromosome 5.

Authors:  M D Wilson; C Riemer; D W Martindale; P Schnupf; A P Boright; T L Cheung; D M Hardy; S Schwartz; S W Scherer; L C Tsui; W Miller; B F Koop
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Automated construction of high-density comparative maps between rat, human, and mouse.

Authors:  A E Kwitek; P J Tonellato; D Chen; J Gullings-Handley; Y S Cheng; S Twigger; T E Scheetz; T L Casavant; M Stoll; M A Nobrega; M Shiozawa; M B Soares; V C Sheffield; H J Jacob
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Parallel construction of orthologous sequence-ready clone contig maps in multiple species.

Authors:  James W Thomas; Arjun B Prasad; Tyrone J Summers; Shih-Queen Lee-Lin; Valerie V B Maduro; Jacquelyn R Idol; Joseph F Ryan; Pamela J Thomas; Jennifer C McDowell; Eric D Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Genome rearrangements in mammalian evolution: lessons from human and mouse genomes.

Authors:  Pavel Pevzner; Glenn Tesler
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.