M Haykowsky1, D Taylor, K Teo, A Quinney, D Humen. 1. Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, and Division of Cardiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. mark.haykowsky@ualberta.ca
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of leg-press (LP) exercise performed with a brief (2 to 3 s) Valsalva maneuver on left ventricular (LV) systolic function and LV wall stress in five healthy men (mean +/- SD age, 27.6 +/- 2.9 years). METHODS AND MEASUREMENTS: Subjects performed submaximal (80% one repetition maximum [1RM], 337.9 +/- 109.1 kg; 95% 1RM, 400.6 +/- 129.8 kg) and maximal LP exercise (420 +/- 118.6 kg) during which central arterial pressure, intrathoracic pressure, and two-dimensional echocardiographic analysis of LV systolic function and LV wall stress were measured. RESULTS: Compared with baseline, LP exercise resulted in an increase in intrathoracic pressure (baseline, 1.7 +/- 2.9 mm Hg; 80% 1RM, 111.7 +/- 20.2 mm Hg; 95% 1RM, 112.2 +/- 21.1 mm Hg; 100% 1RM, 111.0 +/- 21.3 mm Hg; p < 0.05) and LV end-systolic pressure (baseline, 120.0 +/- 13.2 mm Hg; 80% 1RM, 251.6 +/- 15.3 mm Hg; 95% 1RM, 255.3 +/- 12.2 mm Hg; 100% 1RM, 242.8 +/- 16.5 mm Hg; p < 0.05) with no changes in LV end-systolic transmural pressure (baseline, 118.3 +/- 12.6 mm Hg; 80% 1RM, 140.0 +/- 6.1 mm Hg; 95% 1RM, 143.1 +/- 16.1 mm Hg; 100% 1RM, 131.8 +/- 29.7 mm Hg; p > 0.05), LV end-systolic wall stress (baseline, 91.7 +/- 20.2 kilodyne/cm(2); 80% 1RM, 78.0 +/- 24.4 kilodyne/cm(2); 95% 1RM, 81.4 +/- 25.3 kilodyne/cm(2); 100% 1RM, 85.9 +/- 20.1 kilodyne/cm(2); p > 0.05), or LV fractional area change (baseline, 0.48 +/- 0.03; 80% 1RM, 0.52 +/- 0.11; 95% 1RM, 0.53 +/- 0.06; 100% 1RM, 0.52 +/- 0.05; p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: LP exercise performed with a brief Valsalva maneuver is not associated with an alteration in LV wall stress or LV systolic function in healthy young men.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of leg-press (LP) exercise performed with a brief (2 to 3 s) Valsalva maneuver on left ventricular (LV) systolic function and LV wall stress in five healthy men (mean +/- SD age, 27.6 +/- 2.9 years). METHODS AND MEASUREMENTS: Subjects performed submaximal (80% one repetition maximum [1RM], 337.9 +/- 109.1 kg; 95% 1RM, 400.6 +/- 129.8 kg) and maximal LP exercise (420 +/- 118.6 kg) during which central arterial pressure, intrathoracic pressure, and two-dimensional echocardiographic analysis of LV systolic function and LV wall stress were measured. RESULTS: Compared with baseline, LP exercise resulted in an increase in intrathoracic pressure (baseline, 1.7 +/- 2.9 mm Hg; 80% 1RM, 111.7 +/- 20.2 mm Hg; 95% 1RM, 112.2 +/- 21.1 mm Hg; 100% 1RM, 111.0 +/- 21.3 mm Hg; p < 0.05) and LV end-systolic pressure (baseline, 120.0 +/- 13.2 mm Hg; 80% 1RM, 251.6 +/- 15.3 mm Hg; 95% 1RM, 255.3 +/- 12.2 mm Hg; 100% 1RM, 242.8 +/- 16.5 mm Hg; p < 0.05) with no changes in LV end-systolic transmural pressure (baseline, 118.3 +/- 12.6 mm Hg; 80% 1RM, 140.0 +/- 6.1 mm Hg; 95% 1RM, 143.1 +/- 16.1 mm Hg; 100% 1RM, 131.8 +/- 29.7 mm Hg; p > 0.05), LV end-systolic wall stress (baseline, 91.7 +/- 20.2 kilodyne/cm(2); 80% 1RM, 78.0 +/- 24.4 kilodyne/cm(2); 95% 1RM, 81.4 +/- 25.3 kilodyne/cm(2); 100% 1RM, 85.9 +/- 20.1 kilodyne/cm(2); p > 0.05), or LV fractional area change (baseline, 0.48 +/- 0.03; 80% 1RM, 0.52 +/- 0.11; 95% 1RM, 0.53 +/- 0.06; 100% 1RM, 0.52 +/- 0.05; p > 0.05). CONCLUSION:LP exercise performed with a brief Valsalva maneuver is not associated with an alteration in LV wall stress or LV systolic function in healthy young men.
Authors: Jeffrey L Hastings; Felix Krainski; Peter G Snell; Eric L Pacini; Manish Jain; Paul S Bhella; Shigeki Shibata; Qi Fu; M Dean Palmer; Benjamin D Levine Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2012-02-16
Authors: Angela L Spence; Louise H Naylor; Howard H Carter; Christopher L Buck; Lawrence Dembo; Conor P Murray; Philip Watson; David Oxborough; Keith P George; Daniel J Green Journal: J Physiol Date: 2011-10-03 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Josep M Alegret; Raúl Beltrán-Debón; Andre La Gerche; Luis Franco-Bonafonte; Francisco Rubio-Pérez; Nahum Calvo; Manuel Montero Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2015-01-10 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Victor Utomi; David Oxborough; Euan Ashley; Rachel Lord; Sarah Fletcher; Mike Stembridge; Rob Shave; Martin D Hoffman; Greg Whyte; John Somauroo; Sanjay Sharma; Keith George Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2015-03-17 Impact factor: 3.078