Literature DB >> 25576263

Acute effect of static exercise on the cardiovascular system: assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Josep M Alegret1, Raúl Beltrán-Debón, Andre La Gerche, Luis Franco-Bonafonte, Francisco Rubio-Pérez, Nahum Calvo, Manuel Montero.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The acute effect of static exercise on the global dynamics of the cardiovascular system is poorly understood. The use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) may be useful for evaluating this effect.
METHODS: A total of 12 healthy individuals underwent CMR imaging at rest and while performing a maximal sustained static exercise (weight elevation with both legs). We analyzed the effects on left and right ventricular function, ascending aorta dynamics, and venous capacitance using standard cine and phase-contrast sequences.
RESULTS: We observed excellent reproducibility in the measurements of the images obtained at rest as well as during static exercise. During exercise, we observed reduced left (-35 ± 8 %, p < 0.001) and right (-44 ± 9 %, p < 0.001) ventricle end-diastolic volumes, reduced left (-35 ± 16 %, p < 0.001) and right (-43 ± 8 %, p < 0.001) ventricle end-systolic volumes (both with a significantly greater reduction in the right ventricle), a reduced superior vena cava cross-sectional area (-20 ± 17 %, p = 0.003), and increased left ventricle wall thickness. We estimated that there was an increase in left ventricle contractility. There were no significant changes in the left and right ventricular ejection fractions. During exercise, we noted a tendency toward decreased aortic distensibility and a reduction of ascending aorta systolic expansion.
CONCLUSIONS: In healthy individuals, an acute maximal static exercise produced a reduction in the left ventricle, right ventricle, and superior vena cava volumes as well as signs of increased aortic stiffness without increasing left ventricular systolic wall stress. CMR is feasible and useful in evaluating the hemodynamic effects of static exercise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25576263     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-015-3101-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  34 in total

1.  Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance; are they interchangeable?

Authors:  N G Bellenger; M I Burgess; S G Ray; A Lahiri; A J Coats; J G Cleland; D J Pennell
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 2.  Task Force 3: valvular heart disease.

Authors:  Robert O Bonow; Melvin D Cheitlin; Michael H Crawford; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-04-19       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Negative stress echo: further prognostic stratification with assessment of pressure-volume relation.

Authors:  T Bombardini; M Galderisi; E Agricola; V Coppola; G Mottola; E Picano
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 4.164

4.  Cardiac MRI: a new gold standard for ventricular volume quantification during high-intensity exercise.

Authors:  Andre La Gerche; Guido Claessen; Alexander Van de Bruaene; Nele Pattyn; Johan Van Cleemput; Marc Gewillig; Jan Bogaert; Steven Dymarkowski; Piet Claus; Hein Heidbuchel
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 5.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of training mode, imaging modality and body size influences on the morphology and function of the male athlete's heart.

Authors:  Victor Utomi; David Oxborough; Greg P Whyte; John Somauroo; Sanjay Sharma; Rob Shave; Greg Atkinson; Keith George
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  LV hypertrophy in resistance or endurance trained athletes: the Morganroth hypothesis is obsolete, most of the time.

Authors:  Mark J F Haykowsky; Corey R Tomczak
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Central and peripheral hemodynamics during maximal leg extension exercise.

Authors:  D S Miles; J J Owens; J C Golden; R W Gotshall
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1987

8.  Tomographic three-dimensional echocardiographic determination of chamber size and systolic function in patients with left ventricular aneurysm: comparison to magnetic resonance imaging, cineventriculography, and two-dimensional echocardiography.

Authors:  T Buck; P Hunold; K U Wentz; W Tkalec; H J Nesser; R Erbel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-12-16       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Buffering of respiratory variations in venous return by right ventricle: a theoretical analysis.

Authors:  W P Santamore; J N Amoore
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1994-12

Review 10.  Exercise training for blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Veronique A Cornelissen; Neil A Smart
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 5.501

View more
  3 in total

1.  Variability of MRI Aortic Stiffness Measurements in a Multicenter Clinical Trial Setting: Intraobserver, Interobserver, and Intracenter Variability of Pulse Wave Velocity and Aortic Strain Measurement.

Authors:  Maja Hrabak-Paar; Achim Kircher; Saeed Al Sayari; Sebastien Kopp; Francesco Santini; Roland E Schmieder; Nadjia Kachenoura; Denise Yates; Thomas Langenickel; Jens Bremerich; Tobias Heye
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2020-04-30

2.  Cardiac Performance and Cardiopulmonary Fitness After Infection With SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Gregory Wood; Therese Stegeager Kirkevang; Jane Agergaard; Steffen Leth; Esben Søvsø Szocska Hansen; Christoffer Laustsen; Anders Hostrup Larsen; Henrik Kjærulf Jensen; Lars Jørgen Østergaard; Hans Erik Bøtker; Steen Hvitfeldt Poulsen; Won Yong Kim
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-05-13

3.  The effect of varying intensities of lower limb eccentric muscle contractions on left ventricular function.

Authors:  Luke A Howlett; Kyle O'Sullivan; Nicholas Sculthorpe; Joanna Richards
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 3.078

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.