Literature DB >> 11157097

Stereopsis outweighs gravity in the control of the eyes.

H Misslisch1, D Tweed, B J Hess.   

Abstract

The eyes are controlled by multiple brain circuits, some phylogenetically old and some new, whose aims may conflict. Old otolith reflexes counterroll the eyes when the head tilts relative to gravity. Newer vergence mechanisms coordinate the eyes to aid stereoptic vision. We show that counterroll hinders stereopsis, weakly when you look into the distance but strongly when you look near. The resolution of this conflict is that counterroll virtually vanishes when monkeys look close, i.e., stereopsis overrides gravity-driven reflexes but only on near gaze. This balance between gyroscopic and stereoptic mechanisms explains many other puzzling features of primate gaze control, such as the weakness of our otolith-ocular reflexes even during far viewing and the strange geometry of the primate counterpitch reflex, which rolls the eyes clockwise when monkeys look leftward while their heads are tipped nose up, but rolls them counterclockwise when the monkeys look rightward, and reverses this pattern when the head is tipped nose down.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11157097      PMCID: PMC6762304     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  12 in total

1.  Torsional and horizontal vestibular ocular reflex adaptation: three-dimensional eye movement analysis.

Authors:  D Solomon; D S Zee; D Straumann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-16       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of earth-fixed vs head-fixed targets on static ocular counterroll.

Authors:  Manokaraananthan Chandrakumar; Zahra Hirji; Herbert C Goltz; Giuseppe Mirabella; Alan W Blakeman; Linda Colpa; Agnes M F Wong
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-04

3.  Expanding repertoire in the oculomotor periphery: selective compartmental function in rectus extraocular muscles.

Authors:  Joseph L Demer; Robert A Clark; Roberta M da Silva Costa; Jennifer Kung; Lawrence Yoo
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Static ocular counterroll: video-based analysis after minimizing the false-torsion factors.

Authors:  Ichiro Hamasaki; Satoshi Hasebe; Hiroshi Ohtsuki
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Effects of age, viewing distance and target complexity on static ocular counterroll.

Authors:  Herbert C Goltz; Giuseppe Mirabella; Joanne C Y Leung; Alan W Blakeman; Linda Colpa; Khaled Abuhaleeqa; Agnes M F Wong
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-05-03       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  The kinematics of far-near re-fixation saccades.

Authors:  Bernhard J M Hess; H Misslisch
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Environmental inversion effects in face perception.

Authors:  Nicolas Davidenko; Stephen J Flusberg
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-03-14

8.  The under-compensatory roll aVOR does not affect dynamic visual acuity.

Authors:  Michael C Schubert; Americo A Migliaccio; Tammy W C Ng; Aasef G Shaikh; David S Zee
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-24

9.  Effector-dependent stochastic reference frame transformations alter decision-making.

Authors:  T Scott Murdison; Dominic I Standage; Philippe Lefèvre; Gunnar Blohm
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.004

10.  Functional anatomy of the extraocular muscles during vergence.

Authors:  Joseph L Demer; Robert A Clark; Benjamin T Crane; Jun-Ru Tian; Anita Narasimhan; Shaheen Karim
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.453

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.