Literature DB >> 11155322

Toward a more meaningful in vitro fertilization success rate.

R Deonandan1, M K Campbell, T Østbye, I Tummon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective was to explore the variability in in vitro fertilization (IVF) success rates.
METHODS: Published success rates from IVF clinics in North America were investigated to establish types of biases and potential inaccuracies.
RESULTS: Success rates reported by IVF clinics vary with regard to the indices and patient populations used to compute them. Selection bias and misunderstood statistics are major factors contributing to the inappropriateness of certain rates.
CONCLUSIONS: The influence of privatization and market forces also may contribute to the need to oversimplify IVF statistics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11155322      PMCID: PMC3455266          DOI: 10.1023/a:1009489624045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  17 in total

Review 1.  The efficacy and adverse effects of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.

Authors:  P Corabian; D Hailey
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 2.  Calculating the effectiveness of in-vitro fertilization. A review.

Authors:  H Page
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1989-03

3.  Psychosocial factors for couples awaiting in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  K R Daniels
Journal:  Soc Work Health Care       Date:  1989

4.  Selection bias in in vitro fertilization programs.

Authors:  A Hershlag; E H Kaplan; R A Loy; A H DeCherney; G Lavy
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Assisted reproduction technology, multiple births, and adverse perinatal outcome.

Authors:  V Y Yu
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.351

6.  Rates and outcome of pregnancies achieved in the first 4 years of an in-vitro fertilization program.

Authors:  A A Yuzpe; S E Brown; R F Casper; J A Nisker; G Graves
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-01-15       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  The impact of in vitro fertilization on the practice of gynecology and obstetrics.

Authors:  H W Jones
Journal:  Int J Fertil       Date:  1986 May-Jun

8.  Initial experience with in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer at the University of Calgary/Foothills Hospital.

Authors:  P J Taylor; M Mahadevan; A Leader; D Wiseman; F Lorscheider; S Servis
Journal:  J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf       Date:  1985-06

9.  Comparison of urinary human follicle-stimulating hormone and human menopausal gonadotropins for ovarian stimulation in an in vitro fertilization program.

Authors:  B Scoccia; P Blumenthal; C Wagner; G Prins; A Scommegna; E L Marut
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 10.  Defining and interpreting pregnancy success rates for in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  L S Wilcox; H B Peterson; F P Haseltine; M C Martin
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  2 in total

1.  Measuring reproductive tourism through an analysis of Indian ART clinic Websites.

Authors:  Raywat Deonandan; Mirhad Loncar; Prinon Rahman; Sabrina Omar
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2012-09-18

2.  Release of sICAM-1 in oocytes and in vitro fertilized human embryos.

Authors:  Monica Borgatti; Roberta Rizzo; Maria Beatrice Dal Canto; Daniela Fumagalli; Mario Mignini Renzini; Rubens Fadini; Marina Stignani; Olavio Roberto Baricordi; Roberto Gambari
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.