Literature DB >> 1733175

Selection bias in in vitro fertilization programs.

A Hershlag1, E H Kaplan, R A Loy, A H DeCherney, G Lavy.   

Abstract

Pregnancy rates per cycle reported from different in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer programs vary widely. While several programs have reported constant pregnancy rates per cycle, others report declining pregnancy rates. Selection biases at the point of entry and between cycles are discussed as possible explanations of these discrepancies.

Mesh：

Year:  1992        PMID： 1733175     DOI： 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91815-r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN： 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  4 in total

1.  Toward a more meaningful in vitro fertilization success rate.

Authors:  R Deonandan; M K Campbell; T Østbye; I Tummon
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Issues of quality in providing services for subfertile couples.

Authors:  F Song; J M Mason; S Ibbotson; N Freemantle; A F Long; T A Sheldon
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1992-09

3.  Assisted conception on the NHS.

Authors:  T A Sheldon; F Song; N Freemantle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-08-29

4.  In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in Israel: 1990 results from a national survey.

Authors:  D S Seidman; Y Lotan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.412
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.