Literature DB >> 11148807

Identification of women with reduced bone density at the lumbar spine and femoral neck using BMD at the os calcis.

J N Fordham1, D J Chinn, N Kumar.   

Abstract

We assessed the clinical usefulness of bone density measurements at the os calcis as a screening tool to identify patients with low bone density at the lumbar spine and femoral neck. Bone mineral density (BMD) was recorded in 443 women (mean age 60 years) referred to a bone densitometry service. Measurements were made at the lumbar spine and femoral neck using a Lunar DPXL and at the right os calcis using a Peripheral Instantaneous X-ray Imaging (PIXI) dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry system. Average T-scores derived using the manufacturer's data were: 1.59 for the lumbar spine, -1.41 for the femoral neck and -0.87 for the os calcis. The prevalence of osteoporosis using WHO criteria (T-scores of -2.5 or less) was 36% for the lumbar spine or femoral neck but only 9.7% for the os calcis. BMD of the os calcis correlated with that at the lumbar spine (r = 0.69, p < 0.001) and femoral neck (r = 0.67, p < 0.001). The area under the receiver operator characteristics curve was 0.836 (standard error 0.020) for the os calcis related to osteoporosis at the lumbar spine or femoral neck. Optimal accuracy was obtained at a T-score of < or = -1.3 (BMD 0.39 g/cm2) when the sensitivity was 69.6% (95% confidence interval 65.3, 73.9%) and specificity 82.6% (95% confidence interval 79.1, 86.1%). However, the probability of diagnosing low bone density from a given BMD at the os calcis varied by age and site scanned. Accordingly, for informing management strategies, the choice of a single cutoff BMD at the os calcis may not be appropriate and several thresholds may be adopted based on age, the site of interest (lumbar spine or femoral neck) and consideration of associated clinical features. Thus, the use of heel bone density scanners could reduce the number of axial bone density measurements required. The advantages of portability, low cost and shorter scan times should reduce the cost of detection and provide a greater opportunity for identification of women at risk of fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11148807     DOI: 10.1007/s001980070059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  11 in total

1.  Bone density at the os calcis: reference values, reproducibility, and effects of fracture history and physical activity.

Authors:  D J Chinn; J N Fordham; M S Kibirige; N J Crabtree; J Venables; J Bates; O Pitcher
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Age curves of bone mineral density at the distal radius and calcaneus in Koreans.

Authors:  Jin-Young Min; Kyoung-Bok Min; Domyung Paek; Daehee Kang; Sung-Il Cho
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Economic comparison of diagnostic approaches for evaluating osteoporosis in older women.

Authors:  Dale F Kraemer; Heidi D Nelson; Douglas C Bauer; Mark Helfand
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Can peripheral DXA measurements be used to predict fractures in elderly women living in the community?

Authors:  R J Barr; A Adebajo; W D Fraser; J P Halsey; C Kelsey; A Stewart; D M Reid
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-02-10       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  A list of device-specific thresholds for the clinical interpretation of peripheral x-ray absorptiometry examinations.

Authors:  G M Blake; D J Chinn; S A Steel; R Patel; E Panayiotou; J Thorpe; J N Fordham
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  The relationship between social deprivation, osteoporosis, and falls.

Authors:  Derek Pearson; Rachel Taylor; Tahir Masud
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Bone mineral density measurement in the calcaneus with DXL: comparison with hip and spine measurements in a cross-sectional study of an elderly female population.

Authors:  H Salminen; M Sääf; H Ringertz; L-E Strender
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-09-21       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Can radial bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound measurements reduce the number of women who need axial density skeletal assessment?

Authors:  J Damilakis; G Papadokostakis; K Perisinakis; A Hadjipavlou; N Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Risk for osteoporosis in elderly nuns: need for better recognition and treatment.

Authors:  Mary E Elliott; Beth A Martin; Nathan L Kanous; Molly Carnes; Barbara Komoroske; Neil C Binkley
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2003-02

10.  Arsenic, cadmium, and selenium exposures and bone mineral density-related endpoints: The HORTEGA study.

Authors:  Marta Galvez-Fernandez; Maria Grau-Perez; Tamara Garcia-Barrera; Sara Ramirez-Acosta; Jose L Gomez-Ariza; Beatriz Perez-Gomez; Iñaki Galan-Labaca; Ana Navas-Acien; Josep Redon; Laisa S Briongos-Figuero; Antonio Dueñas-Laita; Jose Luis Perez-Castrillon; Maria Tellez-Plaza; Juan Carlos Martin-Escudero
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 8.101

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.