Literature DB >> 11146826

[Reading ability and need for reading aids, inadequate management of a nursing home population].

B Sadowski1, A Grüb, S Trauzettel-Klosinski.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In our society people are getting older and often become handicapped and immobile. Reading then is one of their main passtime and very important for their social integration and independence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-seven (6 males, 71 females) randomly chosen elderly people (age ranged from 77 to 94 years, mean: 85.5 years) staying in nursing homes were examined concerning their reading ability of newspaper print with their own reading equipment. Exclusion criteria were extensive organic diseases and impaired mental ability, such as dementia. Relevant anamnestic data, including ophthalmologic, family and social history were ascertained by questionnaire. Special attention was given to visual acuity for near distance, reading ability, motivation and personal reading aids. Further questions dealt with general diseases, medication, social contacts inside and outside the nursing homes and the former occupation of the patient. If reading of newspaper print with individual glasses was impossible, the effect of magnification was evaluated and the magnification factor was determined (Zeiss reading charts).
RESULTS: Thirty-eight people (45%) were unable to read with their own reading glasses. 91% of them regained reading ability by magnification, they had inadequate visual aids. 77% of this group had a magnification requirement of 1 to 3 times, 14% needed 10 to 25 times of magnification and 9% more than 25 times. Only one person had an electronic magnifying reading system (CCTV).
CONCLUSION: Reading aids of elderly people very frequently are insufficient. Magnification can be helpful in most cases and various magnification systems are available. With this support elderly people could regain their quality of life, their independence and socialization. Nursing costs could also be reduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11146826     DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-10368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd        ISSN: 0023-2165            Impact factor:   0.700


  5 in total

1.  [Spectrum of ophthalmologic and social rehabilitation at the Tübinger Low-Vision Clinic : a retrospective analysis for 1999-2005].

Authors:  N X Nguyen; M Weismann; S Trauzettel-Klosinski
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  [Ophthalmological health care of the institutionalized elderly : The OVIS study].

Authors:  P P Fang; A Schnetzer; D G Kupitz; A P Göbel; T Kohnen; T Reinhard; B Lorenz; H Hoerauf; L Wagenfeld; G Auffarth; F Schaub; H Thieme; B von Livonius; F Alten; A Robering; C Brandl; F Ziemssen; F Krummenauer; F G Holz; R P Finger
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  [Blindness in Germany: dimensions and perspectives].

Authors:  R P Finger
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 4.  [Ophthalmologic healthcare utilization of people in need of long-term care : Analyses of health insurance data of the AOK Baden-Württemberg].

Authors:  Alexander K Schuster; Julia Pick; Frauke Saalmann; Norbert Pfeiffer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  The Prevalence of Visual Impairment in Retirement Home Residents.

Authors:  Luisa Thederan; Susanne Steinmetz; Sabine Kampmann; Anna-Maria Koob-Matthes; Franz Grehn; Thomas Klink
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 5.594

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.