P P Fang1, A Schnetzer1, D G Kupitz1, A P Göbel1, T Kohnen2, T Reinhard3, B Lorenz4, H Hoerauf5, L Wagenfeld6, G Auffarth7, F Schaub8, H Thieme9, B von Livonius10, F Alten11, A Robering12, C Brandl13,14, F Ziemssen15, F Krummenauer16, F G Holz17, R P Finger1. 1. Universitäts-Augenklinik Bonn, Ernst-Abbe-Str. 2, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland. 2. Augenklinik, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Deutschland. 3. Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland. 4. Klinik und Poliklinik für Augenheilkunde, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Gießen, Deutschland. 5. Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Deutschland. 6. Klinik und Poliklinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland. 7. Universitäts-Augenklinik Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland. 8. Zentrum für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinik Köln, Köln, Deutschland. 9. Universitätsaugenklinik Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Deutschland. 10. Augenklinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, München, Deutschland. 11. Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Deutschland. 12. Augenklinik, St. Franziskus-Hospital Münster, Münster, Deutschland. 13. Klinik und Poliklinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland. 14. Lehrstuhl für Genetische Epidemiologie, Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland. 15. Department für Augenheilkunde, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland. 16. Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Fakultät für Gesundheit, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Deutschland. 17. Universitäts-Augenklinik Bonn, Ernst-Abbe-Str. 2, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland. frank.holz@ukb.uni-bonn.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Due to demographic change and societal transformation the number of elderly persons living in retirement homes is growing in Germany. Access to health care is more complicated in the setting of nursing homes. Different regional studies suggest unmet ophthalmological health care needs in institutionalized elderly people. This study assessed the current ophthalmological health care structure and supply status in nursing homes in Germany. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted by 14 study centers in Germany. Elderly people living in 32 nursing homes were included after approval by the local institutional review boards. A standardized examination was performed which included a detailed medical and ocular history, refraction, visual acuity testing, tonometry, biomicroscopy and dilated funduscopy. Unmet ophthalmological health care needs were documented and the data were analyzed descriptively and via logistic regression modelling. RESULTS: A total of 600 participants (434 women and 166 men) aged 50-104 years were examined of which 368 (61%) had ophthalmological conditions requiring treatment. The most prevalent findings were cataracts (315; 53%), disorders of the eyelids (127; 21%), dry eye disease (57; 10%) and posterior capsule opacification (43; 7%). In 63 (11%) of the participants glaucoma was suspected and 55 (9%) of the examined population had a known diagnosis of glaucoma, of whom one third was not on any or on insufficient anti-glaucomatous therapy. 236 (39%) showed signs of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Only 52% of the examined cohort had been examined by an ophthalmologist within the last 5 years and 39% stated that they would currently not be able to consult an ophthalmologist. Reported barriers were mainly transport and lack of support. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates considerable unmet ophthalmological health care needs of the institutionalized elderly in Germany. Novel and reformed models of specialist care provision have to be developed.
BACKGROUND: Due to demographic change and societal transformation the number of elderly persons living in retirement homes is growing in Germany. Access to health care is more complicated in the setting of nursing homes. Different regional studies suggest unmet ophthalmological health care needs in institutionalized elderly people. This study assessed the current ophthalmological health care structure and supply status in nursing homes in Germany. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted by 14 study centers in Germany. Elderly people living in 32 nursing homes were included after approval by the local institutional review boards. A standardized examination was performed which included a detailed medical and ocular history, refraction, visual acuity testing, tonometry, biomicroscopy and dilated funduscopy. Unmet ophthalmological health care needs were documented and the data were analyzed descriptively and via logistic regression modelling. RESULTS: A total of 600 participants (434 women and 166 men) aged 50-104 years were examined of which 368 (61%) had ophthalmological conditions requiring treatment. The most prevalent findings were cataracts (315; 53%), disorders of the eyelids (127; 21%), dry eye disease (57; 10%) and posterior capsule opacification (43; 7%). In 63 (11%) of the participantsglaucoma was suspected and 55 (9%) of the examined population had a known diagnosis of glaucoma, of whom one third was not on any or on insufficient anti-glaucomatous therapy. 236 (39%) showed signs of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Only 52% of the examined cohort had been examined by an ophthalmologist within the last 5 years and 39% stated that they would currently not be able to consult an ophthalmologist. Reported barriers were mainly transport and lack of support. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates considerable unmet ophthalmological health care needs of the institutionalized elderly in Germany. Novel and reformed models of specialist care provision have to be developed.
Entities:
Keywords:
Full inpatient care; Healthcare research; Nursing homes; Patient transport; Visual loss
Authors: Leandra J M de Winter; Carel B Hoyng; Paul G A M Froeling; Carina F M Meulendijks; Gert J van der Wilt Journal: Gerontology Date: 2004 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.140
Authors: Chiyoe Murata; Tetsuji Yamada; Chia-Ching Chen; Toshiyuki Ojima; Hiroshi Hirai; Katsunori Kondo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2010-03-26 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: P Rattay; H Butschalowsky; A Rommel; F Prütz; S Jordan; E Nowossadeck; O Domanska; P Kamtsiuris Journal: Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 1.513
Authors: Annette L Fitzpatrick; Neil R Powe; Lawton S Cooper; Diane G Ives; John A Robbins Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: M M Mauschitz; J Q Li; P P Larsen; J Köberlein-Neu; F G Holz; M M B Breteler; R P Finger Journal: Ophthalmologe Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 1.059
Authors: Ann-Kristin Schröder; Alexander Maximilian Fassmer; Katharina Allers; Falk Hoffmann Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Ove Spreckelsen; Guido Schmiemann; Michael H Freitag; Alexander M Fassmer; Bettina Engel; Falk Hoffmann Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2020-08-04 Impact factor: 2.655