Mark Shen1, Gladys El-Chaar. 1. Department of Pharmacy, Winthrop-University Hospital, 259 1st Street, Mineola, NY, 11501, USA, mshen@winthrop.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Heel lances are common painful procedures performed in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Upon observation, pain relieving methods were not consistently applied during such procedures in our institution. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this three-phase quality improvement project was to improve pain management for heel lance-induced pain in the NICU. SETTING: This study took place in a 27-bed NICU in a level IV perinatal regional center at a 591 bed university affiliated teaching hospital in New York, United States. METHOD: Study Phase 1, involving 25 neonates, documented baseline pain management strategies and pain scores, which were measured before, during, and after heel lancing using the Neonatal Pain Agitation and Sedation Scale (N-PASS). In Study Phase 2, nurses and physicians were educated on the use of sucrose and non-pharmacological measures to prevent and manage heel lance-induced pain. Study Phase 3 (Post education evaluation), had the same procedure as Study Phase 1, and involved another host of 25 neonates. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Pain scores were compared in groups of neonates in Phase 1 (before education) and Phase 3 (after education) before, during and after heel lancing. Other outcome measures included quantifying the use of sucrose and documenting any adverse effects. RESULTS: We found an 84 % increase in the use of sucrose post-education (Phase 3), and most importantly, an 11.2 % reduction in pain scores from heel lances in neonates. Four neonates who did not receive sucrose in Phase 3 had higher pain scores during heel lancing than those who did (3.5 and 2.38, respectively). There were no adverse effects reported with sucrose. CONCLUSION: Health care providers were aware of sucrose but were not using this treatment modality, despite its availability on nursing units. Education was effective in the adoption of sucrose use, leading to a reduction in pain from heel lances in neonates.
BACKGROUND: Heel lances are common painful procedures performed in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Upon observation, pain relieving methods were not consistently applied during such procedures in our institution. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this three-phase quality improvement project was to improve pain management for heel lance-induced pain in the NICU. SETTING: This study took place in a 27-bed NICU in a level IV perinatal regional center at a 591 bed university affiliated teaching hospital in New York, United States. METHOD: Study Phase 1, involving 25 neonates, documented baseline pain management strategies and pain scores, which were measured before, during, and after heel lancing using the Neonatal Pain Agitation and Sedation Scale (N-PASS). In Study Phase 2, nurses and physicians were educated on the use of sucrose and non-pharmacological measures to prevent and manage heel lance-induced pain. Study Phase 3 (Post education evaluation), had the same procedure as Study Phase 1, and involved another host of 25 neonates. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Pain scores were compared in groups of neonates in Phase 1 (before education) and Phase 3 (after education) before, during and after heel lancing. Other outcome measures included quantifying the use of sucrose and documenting any adverse effects. RESULTS: We found an 84 % increase in the use of sucrose post-education (Phase 3), and most importantly, an 11.2 % reduction in pain scores from heel lances in neonates. Four neonates who did not receive sucrose in Phase 3 had higher pain scores during heel lancing than those who did (3.5 and 2.38, respectively). There were no adverse effects reported with sucrose. CONCLUSION: Health care providers were aware of sucrose but were not using this treatment modality, despite its availability on nursing units. Education was effective in the adoption of sucrose use, leading to a reduction in pain from heel lances in neonates.
Authors: Susanne Brummelte; Ruth E Grunau; Vann Chau; Kenneth J Poskitt; Rollin Brant; Jillian Vinall; Ayala Gover; Anne R Synnes; Steven P Miller Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2012-02-28 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Amanda L-C Chen; Thomas J H Chen; Roger L Waite; Jeffrey Reinking; Howard L Tung; Patrick Rhoades; B William Downs; Eric Braverman; Dasha Braverman; Mallory Kerner; Seth H Blum; Nicholas DiNubile; David Smith; Marlene Oscar-Berman; Thomas J Prihoda; John B Floyd; David O'Brien; H H Liu; Kenneth Blum Journal: Med Hypotheses Date: 2008-10-31 Impact factor: 1.538
Authors: Elizabeth E Hathaway; Christina M Luberto; Lois H Bogenschutz; Sue Geiss; Rachel S Wasson; Sian Cotton Journal: Glob Adv Health Med Date: 2015-07