Y Kwon1, S R Jeon, J H Kim, J K Lee, D S Ra, D J Lee, B D Kwun. 1. Department of Neurological Surgery, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, South Korea. ykwon@www.amc.seoul.kr
Abstract
OBJECT: The authors sought to analyze causes for treatment failure following gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS) for intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), in cases in which the nidus could still be observed on angiography 3 years postsurgery. METHODS: Four hundred fifteen patients with AVMs were treated with GKS between April 1990 and March 2000. The mean margin dose was 23.6 Gy (range 10-25 Gy), and the mean nidus volume was 5.3 cm3 (range 0.4-41.7 cm3). The KULA treatment planning system and conventional subtraction angiography were used in treatment planning. One hundred twenty-three of these 415 patients underwent follow-up angiography after GKS. After 3 years the nidus was totally obliterated in 98 patients (80%) and partial obliteration was noted in the remaining 25. There were several reasons why complete obliteration was not achieved in all cases: inadequate nidus definition in four patients, changes in the size and location of the nidus in five patients due to recanalization after embolization or reexpansion after hematoma reabsorption, a large AVM volume in five patients, a suboptimal radiation dose to the thalamic and basal ganglia in eight patients, and radioresistance in three patients with an intranidal fistula. CONCLUSIONS: The causes of failed GKS for treatment of AVMs seen on 3-year follow-up angiograms include inadequate nidus definition, large nidus volume, suboptimal radiation dose, recanalization/reexpansion, and radioresistance associated with an intranidal fistula.
OBJECT: The authors sought to analyze causes for treatment failure following gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS) for intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), in cases in which the nidus could still be observed on angiography 3 years postsurgery. METHODS: Four hundred fifteen patients with AVMs were treated with GKS between April 1990 and March 2000. The mean margin dose was 23.6 Gy (range 10-25 Gy), and the mean nidus volume was 5.3 cm3 (range 0.4-41.7 cm3). The KULA treatment planning system and conventional subtraction angiography were used in treatment planning. One hundred twenty-three of these 415 patients underwent follow-up angiography after GKS. After 3 years the nidus was totally obliterated in 98 patients (80%) and partial obliteration was noted in the remaining 25. There were several reasons why complete obliteration was not achieved in all cases: inadequate nidus definition in four patients, changes in the size and location of the nidus in five patients due to recanalization after embolization or reexpansion after hematoma reabsorption, a large AVM volume in five patients, a suboptimal radiation dose to the thalamic and basal ganglia in eight patients, and radioresistance in three patients with an intranidal fistula. CONCLUSIONS: The causes of failed GKS for treatment of AVMs seen on 3-year follow-up angiograms include inadequate nidus definition, large nidus volume, suboptimal radiation dose, recanalization/reexpansion, and radioresistance associated with an intranidal fistula.
Authors: F Bing; R Doucet; F Lacroix; J P Bahary; T Darsaut; D Roy; F Guilbert; J Raymond; A Weill Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-12-22 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Mehdi Yahia-Cherif; Chifra Fenton; Thomas Bonnet; Olivier De Witte; Stéphane Simon; Viviane De Maertelaer; Benjamin Mine; Florence Lefranc; Boris Lubicz Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2022-10-22 Impact factor: 2.995
Authors: Ahmed J Awad; Brian P Walcott; Christopher J Stapleton; Dale Ding; Cheng-Chia Leed; Jay S Loeffler Journal: J Clin Neurosci Date: 2015-04-23 Impact factor: 1.961
Authors: Sunil A Sheth; Matthew B Potts; Penny K Sneed; William L Young; Daniel L Cooke; Nalin Gupta; Steven W Hetts Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2013-07-27 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Jun Kang; Judy Huang; Philippe Gailloud; Daniele Rigamonti; Michael Lim; Vincent Bernard; Tina Ehtiati; Eric C Ford Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2014-07-08 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Myung Ji Kim; So Hee Park; Keun Young Park; Hyun Ho Jung; Jong Hee Chang; Jin Woo Chang; Jae Whan Lee; Won Seok Chang Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-05-02 Impact factor: 4.241