Literature DB >> 11139293

The rates of molecular evolution in rodent and primate mitochondrial DNA.

D M Weinreich1.   

Abstract

A higher rate of molecular evolution in rodents than in primates at synonymous sites and, to a lesser extent, at amino acid replacement sites has been reported previously for most nuclear genes examined. Thus in these genes the average ratio of amino acid replacement to synonymous substitution rates in rodents is lower than in primates, an observation at odds with the neutral model of molecular evolution. Under Ohta's mildly deleterious model of molecular evolution, these observations are seen as the consequence of the combined effects of a shorter generation time (driving a higher mutation rate) and a larger effective population size (resulting in more effective selection against mildly deleterious mutations) in rodents. The present study reports the results of a maximum-likelihood analysis of the ratio of amino acid replacements to synonymous substitutions for genes encoded in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) in these two lineages. A similar pattern is observed: in rodents this ratio is significantly lower than in primates, again consistent only with the mildly deleterious model. Interestingly the lineage-specific difference is much more pronounced in mtDNA-encoded than in nuclear-encoded proteins, an observation which is shown to run counter to expectation under Ohta's model. Finally, accepting certain fossil divergence dates, the lineage-specific difference in amino acid replacement-to-synonymous substitution ratio in mtDNA can be partitioned and is found to be entirely the consequence of a higher mutation rate in rodents. This conclusion is consistent with a replication-dependent model of mutation in mtDNA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11139293     DOI: 10.1007/s002390010132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  11 in total

1.  Population size and molecular evolution on islands.

Authors:  Megan Woolfit; Lindell Bromham
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The rank ordering of genotypic fitness values predicts genetic constraint on natural selection on landscapes lacking sign epistasis.

Authors:  Daniel M Weinreich
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Size of the protein-coding genome and rate of molecular evolution.

Authors:  Zoran A Rajic; Gradimir M Jankovic; Ana Vidovic; Natasa M Milic; Dejan Skoric; Milorad Pavlovic; Vladimir Lazarevic
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 3.172

4.  Accumulation of slightly deleterious mutations in mitochondrial protein-coding genes of large versus small mammals.

Authors:  Konstantin Popadin; Leonard V Polishchuk; Leila Mamirova; Dmitry Knorre; Konstantin Gunbin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Molecular evolution of PKD2 gene family in mammals.

Authors:  Chun Ye; Huan Sun; Wenhu Guo; Yuquan Wei; Qin Zhou
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Superoxide dismutase 1 is positively selected to minimize protein aggregation in great apes.

Authors:  Pouria Dasmeh; Kasper P Kepp
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 9.261

7.  Lineage-specific differences in the amino acid substitution process.

Authors:  Snehalata Huzurbazar; Grigory Kolesov; Steven E Massey; Katherine C Harris; Alexander Churbanov; David A Liberles
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Simple Biophysical Model Predicts Faster Accumulation of Hybrid Incompatibilities in Small Populations Under Stabilizing Selection.

Authors:  Bhavin S Khatri; Richard A Goldstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Population size dependence of fitness effect distribution and substitution rate probed by biophysical model of protein thermostability.

Authors:  Richard A Goldstein
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  Rates of Protein Evolution across the Marsupial Phylogeny: Heterogeneity and Link to Life-History Traits.

Authors:  Agusto R Luzuriaga-Neira; David Alvarez-Ponce
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.