Literature DB >> 11138472

On the validity of the results from the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty register.

P Söderman1.   

Abstract

The Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register contains more than 200,000 primary and secondary hip replacements. The failure end-point definition is revision. The aim of this thesis was to validate the results presented by the register and to study the outcome of hip replacement surgery in Sweden. The hypothesis was firstly that the number of failure reported to the Swedish THA register are valid and secondly that adding clinical and radiographic failure criteria will dramatically decrease the survival rate for THR implants. The study consisted of three parts with 2-10 years follow-up of patients with total hip replacements (THR). In part I, three general health questionnaires (Nottingham Health Profile, SF-36, EuroQol) and two disease-specific instruments (WOMAC, Harris Hip Score) were tested for validity and reliability (n = 62). The results showed the disease specific questionnaires are at least as valid and reliable as the general instruments are. In part II, all THRs reported to the Swedish THA register 1986 to 1994 (84,884 primary and 10,176 revision hip replacements) were compared with the data from the Discharge register and the Cause of Death register in Sweden. 2,604 patients were randomly selected from the Discharge register to determine if they had undergone any revision surgery. The study showed that the Swedish THA register covers 94% of the revisions actually performed in Sweden and the results did not differ significantly from the data in the Discharge register and the results reported by the patients. In part III, 1,056 patients from the selected cohort were studied further concerning general health and disease-specific health, using the Nottingham Health Profile, SF-36 and WOMAC. An age and gender matched subcohort of 344 patients were then examined clinically, using the Harris Hip Score, and radiographically. The clinical and radiographic failure rates were in several tests as high as the revision rates documented in the Swedish THA register. The clinical results were, however, dependent on demographics, the definition of clinical failure and the scoring system used. The results presented by the register with revision as failure end-point give an exact but limited information about the quality of hip replacement surgery in Sweden.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11138472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl        ISSN: 0300-8827


  15 in total

1.  Joint replacement surgery in the Armed Forces Medical Services, India: The journey so far and looking ahead.

Authors:  B K Chopra
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2015-01

2.  A review of current fixation use and registry outcomes in total hip arthroplasty: the uncemented paradox.

Authors:  Anders Troelsen; Erik Malchau; Nanna Sillesen; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  [The influence of timing of surgery on mortality and early complications in femoral neck fractures, by surgical procedure: an analysis of 22,566 cases from the German External Quality Assurance Program].

Authors:  T Kostuj; R Smektala; U Schulze-Raestrup; C Müller-Mai
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Predictors of patient relevant outcome after total hip replacement for osteoarthritis: a prospective study.

Authors:  A-K Nilsdotter; I F Petersson; E M Roos; L S Lohmander
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 5.  Patient characteristics affecting the prognosis of total hip and knee joint arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Pasqualina L Santaguida; Gillian A Hawker; Pamela L Hudak; Richard Glazier; Nizar N Mahomed; Hans J Kreder; Peter C Coyte; James G Wright
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Uncemented and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Nils P Hailer; Göran Garellick; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Comparison of a fast track protocol and standard care after hip arthroplasty in the reduction of the length of stay and the early weight-bearing resumption: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Martina Rocchi; Cesare Stagni; Marco Govoni; Alessandro Mazzotta; Leonardo Vivarelli; Antonella Orlandi Magli; Mariada Perrone; Maria Grazia Benedetti; Dante Dallari
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  The Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association: a unique collaboration between 3 national hip arthroplasty registries with 280,201 THRs.

Authors:  Leif I Havelin; Anne M Fenstad; Roger Salomonsson; Frank Mehnert; Ove Furnes; Søren Overgaard; Alma B Pedersen; Peter Herberts; Johan Kärrholm; Göran Garellick
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 9.  Risk factors for revision of primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Julian Jz Prokopetz; Elena Losina; Robin L Bliss; John Wright; John A Baron; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  The risk of revision due to dislocation after total hip arthroplasty depends on surgical approach, femoral head size, sex, and primary diagnosis. An analysis of 78,098 operations in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Nils P Hailer; Rüdiger J Weiss; André Stark; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.