Literature DB >> 11137660

Experimental tests of EEG source localization accuracy in spherical head models.

B N Cuffin1, D L Schomer, J R Ives, H Blume.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The locations of electrical sources in the brain can be calculated using EEG data. However, the accuracy of these calculations is not well known because it is usually not possible to compare calculated source locations with actual locations since little accurate location information is available about most sources in the brain.
METHODS: In this study, sources at known locations are created by injecting current into electrodes implanted in the brains of human subjects. The locations of the implanted and scalp EEG electrodes are determined from CTs. The EEG signals produced by these dipolar sources are used to calculate source locations in spherical head models containing brain, skull, and scalp layers. The brain and scalp layers have the same electrical conductivity while 3 different skull conductivity ratios of 1/80th, 1/40th, and 1/20th of brain and scalp conductivity are used. Localization errors have been determined for 177 sources in 13 subjects.
RESULTS: An average localization error of 10.6 (SD=5.5) mm for all 177 source was obtained for a skull conductivity ratio of 1/40. The average errors for the other ratios are only a few millimeters larger. The average localization error for 108 sources at superior locations in the brain is 9.2 (4.4) mm. The average error for 69 inferior location sources is 12.8 (6.2) mm. There are no significant differences in localization accuracy for deep and superficial sources.
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the best average localization that can be achieved using a spherical head model is approximately 10 mm. More realistic head models will be required for greater localization accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11137660     DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00488-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  8 in total

1.  From evoked potentials to cortical currents: Resolving V1 and V2 components using retinotopy constrained source estimation without fMRI.

Authors:  Samuel A Inverso; Xin-Lin Goh; Linda Henriksson; Simo Vanni; Andrew C James
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Pseudohomophone effects provide evidence of early lexico-phonological processing in visual word recognition.

Authors:  Mario Braun; Florian Hutzler; Johannes C Ziegler; Michael Dambacher; Arthur M Jacobs
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Stimulus-dependent spiking relationships with the EEG.

Authors:  Adam C Snyder; Matthew A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Spatial relationship of source localizations in patients with focal epilepsy: Comparison of MEG and EEG with a three spherical shells and a boundary element volume conductor model.

Authors:  Gabriela Scheler; Michael J M Fischer; Alexandra Genow; Cornelia Hummel; Stefan Rampp; Andrea Paulini; Rüdiger Hopfengärtner; Martin Kaltenhäuser; Hermann Stefan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Shifting of activation center in the brain during muscle fatigue: an explanation of minimal central fatigue?

Authors:  Jing Z Liu; Beth Lewandowski; Chris Karakasis; Bing Yao; Vlodek Siemionow; Vinod Sahgal; Guang H Yue
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Experimental validation of the influence of white matter anisotropy on the intracranial EEG forward solution.

Authors:  Nitin B Bangera; Donald L Schomer; Nima Dehghani; Istvan Ulbert; Sydney Cash; Steve Papavasiliou; Solomon R Eisenberg; Anders M Dale; Eric Halgren
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-09       Impact factor: 1.621

7.  EEG Single-Trial Detection of Gait Speed Changes during Treadmill Walk.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lisi; Jun Morimoto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Randomized Multiresolution Scanning in Focal and Fast E/MEG Sensing of Brain Activity with a Variable Depth.

Authors:  A Rezaei; A Koulouri; S Pursiainen
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 3.020

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.